Individual Variation in Parental Care Reaction Norms: Integration of Personality and Plasticity

Abstract

Personality (consistent differences between individuals in behavior) and plasticity (changes within individuals in behavior) are often viewed as separate and opposing phenomena. We tested this idea by analyzing parental care reaction norms in a bird that exhibits biparental care. Personality in provisioning behavior existed (r(ic) = 0.11) and persisted despite being reduced after accounting for individual differences in environment. Plasticity was also evident and differed between the sexes. Male visit rate was associated with changes in brood size and time of day, but female visit rate was associated with changes in nestling age and date. In both sexes changes in visit rate were positively correlated with changes in their partner's visit rate. Both sexes also exhibited multidimensional reaction norms; interaction terms revealed that within-individual visit rates increased more steeply with brood size when nestlings were older, and the effect of the partner's visit rate was sensitive to variation in date, precipitation, and the focal bird's age. Individuals also varied in how they responded (reaction norm slope) to changes in nestling age and partner visits. Moreover, parental personality was interdependent with individual plasticity in several ways. Individuals of both sexes with a high visit rate also responded more positively to changes in nestling age, and males also showed this pattern with changes in partner visit rate. Explicit use of the behavioral reaction norm integrated personality and plasticity, revealed that these are not opposing concepts, and stimulated new hypotheses about sexual conflict over care and provisioning as a life-history trait.

Animal personality and state–behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists

“…Statistically, feedbacks within a single individual can then be captured with a 'double' phenotypic equation where behaviour (y t,b ; b for behaviour) and state (y t,s ; s for state) at time t are both response variables (Box 3). The key difference with classic phenotypic equations [58,59] is that some variables are both predictor and response.…”

Demystifying animal ‘personality’ (or not): why individual variation matters to experimental biologists

“…personality or, in this case, an individual's mean mass) and individual responses across time or contexts (i.e. plasticity, or in this case, an individual's growth rate) (Nussey et al, 2007;Dingemanse et al, 2010;Westneat et al, 2011;Dingemanse and Dochtermann, 2013). Reaction norms are functions that describe the relationship between an individual's phenotype and the environment (or time) and can be estimated using a random slope LMM (also called a random regression model; Henderson, 1982).…”

Predictably Philandering Females Prompt Poor Paternal Provisioning

“…where x ijk is the ith observation on individual j of pair k. We modeled both response variables (incubation behavior and provisioning) with the same model structure (W m and B m ) and added the following fixed and random effects because of their biological relevance: we know that the age of the chicks (chick age), the number of chicks in the brood (clutch size), and the day of the year each affect paternal care, and we therefore center-scaled these and added them to the model as covariates (Westneat et al 2011). We have shown before that the time of day did not statistically significantly affect the frequency of nestling visits; therefore, we did not add this covariate to the model (Schroeder et al 2013).…”