1953
DOI: 10.2307/1364920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Variation in the White-Necked Raven

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the few exceptions of reverse sexual size dimorphism, where females are the larger sex ( Reynolds, 1972 ; Hakkarainen et al, 1996 ; Pande and Dahanukar, 2012 ), males are often larger than females and these size differences are more pronounced in cursorial species ( Hoglund, 1989 ). Furthermore, the relative proportions of the skeleton ( Baumel, 1953 ), skeletal muscle and viscera may differ between the sexes ( Hammond et al, 2000 ). Physiological performance traits (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the few exceptions of reverse sexual size dimorphism, where females are the larger sex ( Reynolds, 1972 ; Hakkarainen et al, 1996 ; Pande and Dahanukar, 2012 ), males are often larger than females and these size differences are more pronounced in cursorial species ( Hoglund, 1989 ). Furthermore, the relative proportions of the skeleton ( Baumel, 1953 ), skeletal muscle and viscera may differ between the sexes ( Hammond et al, 2000 ). Physiological performance traits (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in junglefowl supports this, as the females suffer no loss of social rank in relation to aerobic performance [57]. One obvious factor that could affect only female birds is the requirement of egg laying, which is associated with altered pelvic anatomy [58]. A larger pelvis is a common female trait that has important consequences for locomotion [59,60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, female reproductive specialisation may even require specific skeletal proportions [e.g. a wider pelvis (Baumel, 1953;Smith et al, 2002;Cho et al, 2004) or posture, during pregnancy (Franklin and Conner-Kerr, 1998) or gravidity (Rose et al, 2015b)]. Most studies on gait kinematics, however, have been conducted using individuals of only one sex (Reilly, 2000); without comparing sexes (Rubenson et al, 2004;Watson et al, 2011); or using individuals whose sexes were not reported (Gatesy and Biewener, 1991;Abourachid, 2000Abourachid, , 2001Abourachid and Renous, 2000;Griffin et al, 2004;Nudds et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%