Coastal Engineering 1982 1982
DOI: 10.1061/9780872623736.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Wave Analysis of Irregular Wave Deformation in the Nearshore Zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in Table 1 show peculiar behaviors of the wave transformation in the surf zone. As reported by Mizuguchi (1982a) the individual waves propagate independently in its literal sense in a normal circumstance, snowing almost no change of the wave period distribution. However this results shows a considerable change of the wave period in the surf zone, being affected by the standing waves of significant magnitude.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained in Table 1 show peculiar behaviors of the wave transformation in the surf zone. As reported by Mizuguchi (1982a) the individual waves propagate independently in its literal sense in a normal circumstance, snowing almost no change of the wave period distribution. However this results shows a considerable change of the wave period in the surf zone, being affected by the standing waves of significant magnitude.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However the long period fluctuation in the swash is significant as reported in many field experiments. The individual wave analysis clearly fails to be meaningful when the long period fluctuation exists, unless it is removed before the analysis is applied (Mizuguchi, 1982a).…”
Section: A Model For Irregular Wave Swashmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic assumptions inherent in this approach are that the wave-wave interaction is negligible and the scale of the surf zone system response time is the same as that of the individual wave period. Most models using the wave-by-wave approach have shown good agreement with observations (Mase and Iwagaki, 1982;Mizuguchi, 1982;Dally and Dean, 1986;Dally, 1992;Van Rijn and Wijnberg, 1996;Grasmeijer and Ruessink, 2003). Nevertheless, some researchers also found that the wave-by-wave approach does not outperform the spectral approach in predicting some hydrodynamic quantities such as the wave heights and currents (Grasmeijer and Ruessink, 2003).…”
Section: Approaches To Represent Wave Randomnessmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Several models have been proposed based on this approach, differing mainly in the regular wave model used to simulate the propagation of the individual waves [e.g. the models of Mase and Iwagaki, 1982;Mizuguchi, 1982;Dally, 1992;Kuriyama, 1996;Goda, 2004]. This approach is particularly useful if a detailed wave height distribution is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%