2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.029719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual ZnO nanowires for photodetectors with wide response range from solar-blind ultraviolet to near-infrared modulated by bias voltage and illumination intensity

Abstract: ZnO nanowires have relatively high sensitivity as ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors, while the bandgap of 3.37 eV is an important limitation for their applications in solar-blind UV (SBUV), visible (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) range. Besides UV response, in this study, we demonstrate the promising applications of individual undoped ZnO NWs as high performance SBUV-VIS-NIR broad-spectral-response photodetectors, strongly depended on applied bias voltage and illumination intensity. The dominant mechanism is attri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, photocurrent changes are not spontaneous and show gradual variations. Similar behavior has been observed for other semiconductors such as ZnO nanowires [37], MoO 3 nonobelt [38] and Thylakoid-Carbon Nanotube Composites [39]. This behavior has been ascribed to the low sensitivity of photoelectrode to the light wavelength, light intensity and amount of applied bias potential.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Measurementsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, photocurrent changes are not spontaneous and show gradual variations. Similar behavior has been observed for other semiconductors such as ZnO nanowires [37], MoO 3 nonobelt [38] and Thylakoid-Carbon Nanotube Composites [39]. This behavior has been ascribed to the low sensitivity of photoelectrode to the light wavelength, light intensity and amount of applied bias potential.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Measurementsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Correspondingly, the potential barrier height and depletion region width decreases. This in turn increases dark as well as UV photocurrent thereby decreasing the net photocurrent of the detector thus 5 V is supposed to be optimum bias voltage[33].These results indicate that present photodetector demonstrates a selectivity and sensitivity towards the UV-A light. The linear behavior of the I-V photocurrent curve confirms the good ohmic contact of photoconductive detector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…At an applied bias voltage of 5 V a larger number of photogenerated electrons can cross the electrode/ZnO interface, whereas at lower applied bias voltage very few electrons could pass the interface, resulting in poor photoresponse. Furthermore, at a relatively higher bias voltage, the band‐edge response extends towards the visible region . This visible‐light response upon applying a relatively higher bias voltage is due the fact that, at higher bias voltage a higher number of electrons can be injected into the surface states of ZnO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This visible‐light response upon applying a relatively higher bias voltage is due the fact that, at higher bias voltage a higher number of electrons can be injected into the surface states of ZnO. Thus, these electrons can also be filled into the depletion region, resulting into a reaction of V o + and V o ++ to V O , namely trap filling and correspondingly, the potential barrier height and depletion region width will decrease . The obtained photocurrent for the devices is much higher than the dark current.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%