Individualism, collectivism, and client expression of different emotions: their relations to perceived counselor effectiveness

Abstract

This study examined how individualism, collectivism, and counselor emphasis of different client emotions were related to perceived counselor effectiveness. Data were collected from 192 (122 women and 70 men) Korean students attending a large university in South Korea and from 170 (115 women and 55 men) American students attending a large Midwestern university in the United States. Participants read a counseling script in which a counselor emphasized client expression of either egofocused emotions (e.g., anger) or other-focused emotions (e.g., guilt). Results from a hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that South Korean students who were more individualistic showed more positive perceptions of counselor effectiveness when the counselor emphasized the expression of the client's ego-focused emotions, whereas more individualistic American students perceived the counselor as less effective when the counselor emphasized the expression of the client's other-focused emotions. Also, the results demonstrated that participants who were high collectivist and low individualistic showed more positive perceptions of counselor effectiveness when the counselor emphasized the expression of the client's other-focused emotions, when compared to those who were high collectivist and high individualistic. Implications for counseling practice and future studies are discussed.

Saving Face in Front of the Computer? Culture and Attributions of Human Likeness Influence Users' Experience of Automatic Facial Emotion Recognition

“…According to a large-scale comparison of display rules across 32 countries by Matsumoto et al (2008a), this might actually extend to general in-and out-group effects: Although participants from collectivistic societies reported less expressivity in general, they actually endorsed negative emotional displays toward strangers much more than participants with an individualistic background. This observation in turn connects to a growing body of literature about the "appropriateness" of selected emotional states (e.g., Kitayama et al, 2000;Eid and Diener, 2001;Seo, 2011), which has suggested that individualistic cultures strongly favor displays of personal success (e.g., pride, joy), whereas collectivists prefer emotions that highlight interrelatedness-even if their expression emphasizes personal failure (e.g., guilt, shame). Considering the core principles of both cultural orientations, this actually makes perfect sense: Just as the visible acknowledgment of personal shortcomings highlights the investment in the collective well-being, turning guilt and embarrassment into other-focused emotions (Markus and Kitayama, 1991), displays of pride or happiness mostly serve to express private gain, therefore meshing with a more individualistic philosophy (i.e., ego-focused emotions).…”

Exploring effects of childhood parentification on adult‐depressive symptoms in Korean college students

“…Moreover, people from collectivistic cultures are encouraged to display other‐focused emotions (e.g., sympathy/empathy, feelings of interpersonal communion) for which others are the primary referent. Conversely, individuals from individualistic cultures are encouraged to express ego‐focused emotions such as anger, frustration (Seo, ). Therefore, parentified Korean children are likely to internalize their feelings and difficulties.…”

Antioppressive approaches to alliance rupture and repair: A critical–cultural–relational model of rupture resolution.

“…Farber (2006) highlighted the role that culture plays in self-disclosure, which may impact how a rupture is expressed. Individuals with values that lean toward collectivism may not only hold authority figures in high esteem but also refrain from disclosing information that would present another person in an unfavorable light (Seo, 2011). Asian immigrant clients, for example, may be less inclined to disclose how they feel about their therapists out of respect for their position or to maintain harmony in the relationship.…”