2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial

Abstract: NCT01956110.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
283
4
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
22
283
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, follitropin delta displays a noninferior pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to follitropin alfa, with a reduced rate of complications such as OHSS (39). The differences observed clinically between the two rFSH proteins might be caused by differences in their glycosylation (14) since variations in glycosylation have been reported to affect FSH pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (15, 16, 17, 18, 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, follitropin delta displays a noninferior pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared to follitropin alfa, with a reduced rate of complications such as OHSS (39). The differences observed clinically between the two rFSH proteins might be caused by differences in their glycosylation (14) since variations in glycosylation have been reported to affect FSH pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (15, 16, 17, 18, 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several algorithms incorporating biomarkers of ovarian reserve have been developed to individualize dosing of different gonadotropin preparations . Two of these, which incorporate anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations as a biomarker of ovarian reserve, have been externally validated in randomized controlled clinical trials …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a large trial evaluated individualized vs standard FSH dosing, and used a dosing algorithm that contained both anti‐Müllerian hormone and body weight with more gradual FSH dose reductions for predicted hyper responders. Designed specifically for a new recombinant FSH (follitropin δ), with a different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile than the conventional follitropin α or β, the generalizability of this algorithm has to be demonstrated first before application in daily practice can be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%