2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1880-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individually tailored treatment with epirubicin and paclitaxel with or without capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized multicenter trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated HRs (not reported) showed that for many treatments the assumption of proportional hazards is not tenable due to the markedly change of HRs through time, suggesting that the use of this more flexible methodology is more appropriate than the analysis based on the HRs alone. Hatschek [59] 2012 EPI ? PAC Table S2A), the estimates of the difference in the expected PFS/TTP between EXE/EVE versus each single chemotherapy-based treatment are represented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated HRs (not reported) showed that for many treatments the assumption of proportional hazards is not tenable due to the markedly change of HRs through time, suggesting that the use of this more flexible methodology is more appropriate than the analysis based on the HRs alone. Hatschek [59] 2012 EPI ? PAC Table S2A), the estimates of the difference in the expected PFS/TTP between EXE/EVE versus each single chemotherapy-based treatment are represented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test cohort consisted of 304 women with metastatic breast cancer who were enrolled in a randomized phase III trial conducted between 2002 and 2007 in Sweden, comparing two different first‐line chemotherapy regimens (Hatschek et al., 2012). Patients with brain metastases, HER2 amplified tumors, or other malignancies diagnosed within five years of enrollment were excluded from the trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median follow-up for postrecurrence survival was 45 months (range, 9-135 months) for patients alive at last update (July 2013). Detailed information regarding the design and outcome of the trial has been published (22). Fine-needle aspirates (FNA) of at least one metastatic lesion were collected before commencement of treatment whenever possible.…”
Section: Patients and Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%