2014
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2013.0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO) Activity During the Primary Immune Response to Influenza Infection Modifies the Memory T Cell Response to Influenza Challenge

Abstract: The generation of a heterosubtypic memory T cell response is important for cross-protective immunity against unrelated strains of influenza virus. One way to facilitate the generation of the memory T cell population is to control the activity of immune modulatory agents. The enzyme, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), is upregulated during influenza infection by the interferon response where IDO activity depletes tryptophan required in T cell response. In this study, IDO activity was pharmacologically inhibited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our findings with lung epithelial A549 cells, in neuronal cells IFN-␥ strongly induced IDO expression, causing inhibition of HSV replication, which could be rescued by Trp (54). Interaction of IDO with several other viruses, such as HIV, cytomegalovirus, RSV, hepatitis virus, and influenza A virus, has been unraveled recently, but mainly in the context of T cell responses and induced immunity (52,(55)(56)(57)(58). The effect of IDO on PIV3, however, was appreciated in nonimmune cells; it is thus representative of a cellintrinsic mechanism that directly inhibits viral gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar to our findings with lung epithelial A549 cells, in neuronal cells IFN-␥ strongly induced IDO expression, causing inhibition of HSV replication, which could be rescued by Trp (54). Interaction of IDO with several other viruses, such as HIV, cytomegalovirus, RSV, hepatitis virus, and influenza A virus, has been unraveled recently, but mainly in the context of T cell responses and induced immunity (52,(55)(56)(57)(58). The effect of IDO on PIV3, however, was appreciated in nonimmune cells; it is thus representative of a cellintrinsic mechanism that directly inhibits viral gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In murine influenza, inhibition of IDO1 activity in wild-type mice with 1-DL-MT or infection of IDO1 −/− mice, enhanced the primary immune response to infection by increasing the production of macrophage-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines, promoting CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell function, as well as Th1 responses [529,530]. Secondary immune responses are also affected, as 1-DL-MT treatment or Ido1 gene deficiency also resulted in elevated effector CD4 + Th1 and Th17 responses, increased the number of effector memory CD8 + T-cells, altered the memory CD8 + T-cell repertoire and decreased numbers of CTLA-4-expressing Tregs [529,530,553]. IDO1 inhibition is also associated with improved tissue repair in influenza [553].…”
Section: Role Of Ido1 In Virus Infection In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary immune responses are also affected, as 1-DL-MT treatment or Ido1 gene deficiency also resulted in elevated effector CD4 + Th1 and Th17 responses, increased the number of effector memory CD8 + T-cells, altered the memory CD8 + T-cell repertoire and decreased numbers of CTLA-4-expressing Tregs [529,530,553]. IDO1 inhibition is also associated with improved tissue repair in influenza [553]. However, despite these clear enhancements of primary and secondary immune responses, there is no apparent difference in lung viral burden or morbidity recorded between untreated and 1-DL-MT-or 1-D-MT-treated wild-type mice [529,530,553], although infected IDO1 −/− mice exhibit improved survival and more rapid recovery from influenza virus infection [530].…”
Section: Role Of Ido1 In Virus Infection In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, IDO was originally shown to inhibit the replication of the unicellular protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii in immune cells (Dai et al, 1994; Mehraj and Routy, 2016; Mellor and Munn, 2003). It is only recently that the relationship of IDO with viral pathogenesis and the antiviral role of IDO have been appreciated, notably with measles virus, herpes simplex virus, hepatitis B virus, influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus (Adams et al, 2004; Huang et al, 2013; Mao et al, 2011; Obojes et al, 2005; Rabbani et al, 2016; Sage et al, 2014). The majority of these studies were conducted in cells of immune origin, such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DC), or in the live animal, which indicated a role of IDO in regulating adaptive immunity (Mellor and Munn, 2003; Schmidt and Schultze, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%