Indonesia Grapples with the Indo-Pacific: Outreach, Strategic Discourse, and Diplomacy

Abstract

This article analyses and evaluates Indonesia’s grappling with the Indo-Pacific. Analysis is threefold – Indonesia’s actorness in the Indo-Pacific, its strategic discourse on the Indo-Pacific, and its Indo-Pacific diplomacy. Actorness is pursued with regard to Indonesia’s more active involvement in regional and subregional structures in the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean. Strategic discourse is threefold – Natalegawa’s “Indo-Pacific Treaty” concept (2013–2014), Widodo’s “maritime nexus” drive (2014 onwards), and the current “Indo-Pacific Cooperation Concept” (IPCC; 2018 onwards). Diplomacy is pursued with regard to Indonesia’s relationship with Australia, Japan, China, India, and the United States. The article concludes that while Indonesia certainly is on the rise as an Indo-Pacific actor, its continuing naval weakness undermines Indonesia’s “maritime nexus” stance, while its reluctance to challenge China leaves Indonesia’s Indo-Pacific Treaty and its IPCC vague and to some degree ignoring uncomfortable security issues posed by China. A closer synergy for Indonesia with the US and Japanese Free and Open Indo-Pacific initiative is suggested.

Indonesia Defense Strategy Towards Indo-Pacific (Case Study: The ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific)

“…In 2013, Indonesia began to adopt the Indo-Pacific concept in line with the popularity of the term in the international geopolitical arena. The foreign ministry translated the concept as a crossing of two ocean regions with Indonesia placed in a central position (Scott, 2019).…”

“…Collective solutions are assumed by Indonesia will be able to minimize the intensity of threats to Indonesia's foreign policy vision of the Indo-Pacific region. However, a number of obstacles are still faced considering that ASEAN countries have not yet accepted the concept proposal, the scope of cooperation is still targeting ordinary security issues, and the unclear orientation of Indonesia's behavior to Great Power (Scott, 2019).…”

“…The Global Maritime Fulcrum is comprehensive as it giving birth to new concepts such as maritime security, maritime diplomacy, maritime economics, and maritime power (Scott, 2019). To conduct these complex inseparable objectives, Indonesia's maritime affairs ministry and defense ministry, as well as foreign affairs ministry, have to work together and raise cooperations both at regional and international levels (Hidayat and Ridwan, 2017).…”

Democracy in Indonesian Strategic Narratives. A New Framework of Coherence Analysis

“…Joko Widodo, the president of Indonesia since 2014, at the beginning of his presidential term, outlined general directions of foreign policy outlook: (1) promotion of an archipelago identity; (2) middle power diplomacy; (3) strengthening the relationship with Indo-Pacific region (Scott, 2019); and (4) economic diplomacy (Connelly, 2015: 5–6). These goals do not contradict the general directions of the Indonesian foreign policy; however, there is no reference to democracy (and Muslim democracy) or the image of Indonesia; and identity is defined through a geographical aspect.…”

Las Estrategias de Indonesia frente al Ascenso de China

“…De esta manera, a los cinco pilares originales del PMG enunciados en 2014 se agregaron dos más en 2017, para componer los actuales siete pilares sobre los cuales se construye el poder marítimo de Indonesia. Estos son 1) revivir una cultura marítima, 2) mejorar el desarrollo de los recursos marítimos, 3) desarrollar la economía, facilitar el comercio y la infraestructura marítima, 4) desplegar una diplomacia marítima, 5) reforzar la defensa naval y la seguridad marítima, 6) reforzar la protección ambiental y la administración del espacio natural marítimo, y 7) establecer instituciones y mejorar la gobernanza marítima (Anwar 2018;Laksmana 2017;Santoso y Nafisah 2017;Scott 2019;Shekhar 2018).…”