Indonesian National Growth Reference Charts Better Reflect Height and Weight of Children in West Java, Indonesia, than WHO Child Growth Standards

Abstract

Objective: The Indonesia Basic Health Research 2018 indicates that Indonesian children are still among the shortest in the world. When referred to World Health Organization Child Growth Standards (WHOCGS), the prevalence of stunting reaches up to 43% in several Indonesian districts. Indonesian National Growth Reference Charts (INGRC) were established in order to better distinguish between healthy short children and children with growth disorders. We analyzed height and weight measurements of healthy Indonesian children using INGRC and WHOCGS. Methods: 6972 boys and 5800 girls (n=12,772), aged 0-59 months old, from Bandung District were measured. Z-scores of length/height and body mass index were calculated based on INGRC and WHOCGS. Results: Under 5-year-old Indonesian children raised in Bandung are short and slim. Mean height z-scores of boys is -2.03 [standard deviation (SD) 1.31], mean height z-scores of girls is -2.03 (SD 1.31) when referred to WHOCGS indicating that over 50% of these children are stunted. Bandung children are heterogeneous, with substantial subpopulations of tall children. Depending on the growth reference used, between 9% and 15% of them are wasted. Wasted children are on average half a SD taller than their peers. Conclusion: WHOCGS seriously overestimates the true prevalence of undernutrition in Indonesian children. The present investigation fails to support evidence of undernutrition at a prevalence similar to the over 50% prevalence of stunting (WHOCGS) versus 13.3% (INGRC). We suggest refraining from using WHOCGS, and instead applying INGRC that closely mirror height and weight increments in Bandung children. INGRC appear superior for practical and clinical purposes, such as detecting growth and developmental disorders.

Fear, violence, inequality, and stunting in Guatemala

“…The WHO website provides information on the samples of people and the methods used to create the standards. The pros and cons of the standards are not debated here, as they have been discussed in many published articles (Khadilkar, 2013; Novina et al, 2020).…”

Using the National Indonesian Growth Chart to assess short stature and obesity in urban schoolchildren in Surakarta, Indonesia: comparisons to the WHO 2007 and CDC 2000 Growth Charts

“…However, using the NIGC, only 13.3% were stunted. 11 Similarly, the prevalence of stunting in children under five years in the Musi sub-district, Indonesia, was higher based on the WHO chart (53.9%) than based on the national reference (10.7%). 12 A study in Malaysia, another Southeast Asian country, found that 6.1% more children under six years were assessed with short stature when using the WHO charts than when using a national/local chart.…”

“…A study in Bandung, Indonesia, found that more than 50% of children under five years old were considered to have stunted growth based on the WHO charts. However, using the NIGC, only 13.3% were stunted 11. Similarly, the prevalence of stunting in children under five years in the Musi sub-district, Indonesia, was higher based on the WHO chart (53.9%) than based on the national reference (10.7%) 12.…”

Comparison of Indonesian Growth Reference Chart and World Health Organization Child Growth Standard in Detecting Stunting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 15,874 Children

“…The study selection process is listed in Figure 1 , where ultimately, three studies were selected for inclusion in this review ( 12 , 13 , 14 ). Two studies ( 12 , 13 ) had good quality with a NOS of eight each, while Hilmy and Fatharani’s ( 14 ) (2021)study only scored five using NOS ( Table 2 ). All of the studies were cross-sectional studies.…”