Indonesian Ulema Council Fatwa On Religious Practices During Covid-19 Pandemic: An Investigation Of Muslim Compliance

Hanafi, Yusuf; Taufiq, Ahmad; Saefi, Muhamad; Ikhsan, M. Alifudin; Diyana, Tsania Nur; Hadiyanto, Andy; Purwanto, Yedi; Mawardi, Ahmad Imam

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-33784/v1

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Meskipun demikian, beberapa riset juga menyebutkan bahwa fatwa hukum MUI tentang libur Jumat bisa dan layak menjadi pegangan masyarakat dalam tradisi keagamaan mereka di era pandemi (Zulkarnain et al, 2020). Pun juga dalam salah satu riset disebutkan bahwa masyarakat Muslim Indonesia memiliki kemenerimaan yang positif terhadap fatwa MUI (Hanafi et al, 2020).…”

Section: Pergulatan Nalar Fikih Dalam Implementasi Fatwa Mui Tentangunclassified

The Struggle of Fiqh Reasoning in the Implementation of MUI’s Fatwa on Worship during Pandemic in the Island of Lombok

War'i¹

2021

dialog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses the implementation of MUI’s fatwa on worship during Covid-19 pandemic. Social facts show that the implementation of the fatwa has given rise to various socio-religious conflicts in Lombok island. Through a qualitative approach, the paper concludes: First, the people of Lombok Muslim community disapprove the fatwa. Second, there is a conceptual difference between the government as the beholder of the MUI’s fatwa and the community's religious traditions that have been maintained for a long time. Third, the model of fiqh law reasoning used by the government in general is a textual (normative) model that is contrary to society's use of historical meaning. Therefore, a dialogical process is needed for a solution to social problems that occur as a result of the implementation of the ulama’s fatwa which is used as government policy so that it does not appear to be coercive by involving elements of ulama, goverment, and society. The dialog conectivity of these three elements in negotiating their understandings of fiqh to place the intent and purpose of a legal product (fatwa) will encourage the realization of inclusive fiqh reasoning. Keywords: fiqh reason, MUI’s fatwa, mosque closing Tulisan ini mengkaji secara fenomenologis implementasi fatwa MUI tentang ibadah di tengah pandemi wabah Covid-19. Fakta sosial menunjukkan bahwa implementasi fatwa tersebut telah melahirkan berbagai konflik sosial keagamaan di Pulau Lombok. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif tulisan berkesimpulan: Pertama, Respon masyarakat muslim Lombok sebagai demografi dengan banyaknya masjid adalah adanya ketidakmenerimaan baik secara psikologis, sosial, dan kultural. Kedua, Terjadi pertentangan konseptual antara pemerintah selaku pemegang fatwa MUI dengan konsep tradisi keagamaan masyarakat yang telah lama ada dan menjadi pedoman mereka. Ketiga, model penalaran hukum fikih yang digunakan pemerintah secara umum adalah model pemaknaan tekstual (normatif) bertentangan dengan masyarakat yang menggunakan pemaknaan historis. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan proses dialogis sebagai langkah solutif atas problem sosial yang terjadi akibat implementasi fatwa ulama yang dijadikan kebijakan pemerintah agar tidak terkesan memaksa dengan melibatkan unsur ulama, umara’, dan mujtama’. Konektivitas dialog tiga unsur ini dalam menegosiasikan pemahaman fikih mereka untuk mendudukkan maksud dan tujuan suatu produk hukum (fatwa) akan mendorong terwujudnya nalar fikih yang inklusif. Kata Kunci: nalar fikih, fatwa MUI, penutupan masjid

show abstract

Section: Pergulatan Nalar Fikih Dalam Implementasi Fatwa Mui Tentangunclassified

The Struggle of Fiqh Reasoning in the Implementation of MUI’s Fatwa on Worship during Pandemic in the Island of Lombok

War'i¹

2021

dialog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The questionnaires linked to Google form were developed by the researchers based on the guidelines of COVID-19 for the Muslim community regarding the MUI fatwa No. 14 of 2020, which came out in mid-March (Hanafi, et al, 2020) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention COVID-19, 2020). This research instrument contained the following three sections related to knowledge, attitude, and behavior toward COVID-19 infection.…”

Section: Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviours Towards Covid-19 Transmission Among Jakarta-Bogor-Depok-Tangerang-Bekasi Residents

Desmawati

Bachtiar²,

Fatema

et al. 2021

Jur. Kep. Soed.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jakarta-Bogor-Depok-Tangerang-Bekasi (Jabodetabek) is the city with the most populous population in Indonesia. This study aims to explore the knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of Jabodetabek people as an epicentre covid-19 in Indonesia. This study was a descriptive quantitative online study with a survey design used a self-developed online questionnaire on 297 Jabodetabek residents in Indonesia. The chairman of the neighbourhood was encouraged to roll out the google form (link) to as many participants as possible, and then the link was forwarded to the next participants and so on. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Among the participants, 72.1 % were female, overall range of correct answers for knowledge questionnaire was 53.2-97.3%, that for attitude was 21.55-93.3% and for behaviors was 66.3-98.7 %. In general, participants had a good knowledge about the disease, a positive attitude, and behavior towards protective measures. However, the results showed that only 22.55% participants state Indonesian government can win the battle against covid-19, the rest (78.45%) less optimistic attitudes, and this will impact less good practice toward covid-19 in the future, although currently still 66.3% of participants following Government Indonesian policy. Findings of this study revealed that knowledge among people of Jabodetabek about covid-19 is satisfactory. Yet almost half of participants are lacking belief in the plague. Better trust and behavior is required to tackle Covid-19 in Jabodetabek-Indonesia.

show abstract

“…In this case, the way Ganjar mentioned "hoax" as triggering point of this unethical action was marked as the value he imposed to the mind of the society, so whenever the society was accepting certain information, the valid ones should be aligned with the information from the government. The inclusion of religious authority such as MUI is a way to maintain the public trust towards the government amid the current wave of public distrust (Hanafi et al, 2020) as the effect from previous aspects. The validity of certain information or series of acts is what we called legitimacy because legitimating justifications that served for specific series of acts is about how certain political actor sees the reality and validates the acceptable legitimacy (Abdi & Basarati, 2018;van Dijk, 1998).…”

Section: Critical Analysis Of Ganjar's Speech: a Constructed Politicamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This phenomenon was somehow the result of the unprepared prevention of the outbreak by the highest authority (Almuttaqi, 2020;Ansori, 2020;Putri, 2020) compared to foreign countries which started earlier to prevent the worst (Ansori, 2020). The state officials show these underestimated practices then created poor communication and disorganization among the governmental bodies (Hanafi et al, 2020;Noor et al, 2020). It was clear that in the amid of disorganization shown by the government and the inconsistency of information delivered by the spoke person for the countermeasure of Covid-19 to the public (Noor et al, 2020), were might the factors of prejudices and fear of death threat among the society (Clissold et al, 2020;Freckelton QC, 2020), in this case, towards the health workers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Analysis of Ganjar’s Speech Covid-19: A Constructed Political Identity

Pandanwangi

Nurhayati

Qodir

2020

lkw

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines Ganjar Pranowo’s political identity through his linguistic features constructed through his speech for responding the case of some of Ungaran citizen’s refusal on accepting a Covid-19 patient’s remain body. The speech is analyzed with Fairclough’s CDA as the main framework of analysis. There are three dialectical stages to complete his framework, namely the text analysis, the interpretation of text analysis, and the explanation. The textual part of the analysis will be explained by using Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Meanwhile, the interpretation part will be examined by using Halliday’s appraisal system, and van Dijk’s political discourse analysis will analyze the explanation part. This article states that the interpretation analysis are both ‘judgement’ and ‘appreciation’ from Ganjar shows some degrees of positive polarity and other degrees of opposing polarity. The Ganjar’s political identity represented from his response-speech is humanitarian-oriented, socio-religiously aware, status quo holder, and as a part of the bigger political system’s discourse maker. In this case, response-speech could be selected and in line with the context of society need. Therefore, this article suggests that disaster management should not differentiate community identity on the one hand. The elite also could deliver the policies in a soft statement that is accepted by the public on the other hand.

show abstract

Indonesian Ulema Council Fatwa On Religious Practices During Covid-19 Pandemic: An Investigation Of Muslim Compliance

Cited by 13 publications

References 19 publications

The Struggle of Fiqh Reasoning in the Implementation of MUI’s Fatwa on Worship during Pandemic in the Island of Lombok

The Struggle of Fiqh Reasoning in the Implementation of MUI’s Fatwa on Worship during Pandemic in the Island of Lombok

Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviours Towards Covid-19 Transmission Among Jakarta-Bogor-Depok-Tangerang-Bekasi Residents

Critical Analysis of Ganjar’s Speech Covid-19: A Constructed Political Identity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About