Indoor air quality: an enviro-cultural perspective

Abstract

A healthy building seems to be desirable even if one does not know about its true implication on building occupants, performance, efficiency, productivity, cost, and maintenance. However, convincing a project's developer or building's owner about the merits of taking care of the indoor air quality is not as easy as most buildings' users think. This hardship is because the justification of the extra effort, time and resources needed for establishing a building with a higher level of indoor air quality is not as easy as many other building aspects. Architects and engineers can justify a higher price for stylish furniture, or better lighting design for a building's owner easier than justifying the cost of a system's add-ons needed for better indoor air quality. Studies show that some cultural dimensions are involved in the perception of the environmental risk, and hence impact the decision of having healthy buildings at the design stage. This paper analyzes the perception of the foreseeable extra cost and effort required for having a healthy building with a higher level of indoor air quality in light of the perception of the environmental risk and some other cultural factors. This empirical analysis is helpful for prospective developers and owners as it might be a great motivation for them to spend on enhancing the indoor air quality of their buildings. The argument is also critical for understanding the factors that lie behind the levels of indoor air quality in the built environment across cultures.

The impacts of building characteristics, social psychological and cultural factors on indoor environment quality productivity belief

“…Another study found that Slovenian occupants appeared to be more outspoken for the control of electric lighting, shades, and thermostatic values than the Italian occupants [72]. Daily cultural and environmental attitudes also impact certain aspects of IEQ despite similar thermal conditions [73,76]. While considering thermal comfort indices, researchers should take into account the psychological and socio-cultural processes involved in environmental assessment [73].…”

Invigorating Health Strategy in an Integrated Design Process

“…They have different arrangements, have different responsibilities, and do not participate in the project throughout. Even when highperformance systems are built, they may not perform as expected due to poor coordination during the design and construction processes [10].…”

“…In this regard, the emphasis on healthy building design has been on implementing integrated and comprehensive processes across the planning, design, and construction phases of a building's lifecycle to create a holistic perspective and teamwork [8]. The advancements have been driven by leveraging changing paradigms from the traditional design process (TDP) to the integrated design process (IDP) with a sharp focus on healthy building standards [9][10][11]. Thus, we posit further advancement of IDP in the context of incorporating HS in the prevailing IDP healthy building construction guidelines with a sequential iterative procedure.…”