2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7841898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor and Outdoor 5G Diffraction Measurements and Models at 10, 20, and 26 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Work in [75] shows that received power of wideband 73 GHz signals has a stationary mean over slight movements but average power can change by 25 dB as the mobile transitioned a building cornor from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) to LOS in an urban microcell (UMi) environment [88], [94]. Measurements at 10, 20 and 26 GHz demonstrate that diffraction loss can be predicted using well-known models as a mobile moves around a corner using directional antennas [95], and human body blockage causes more than 40 dB of fading [88], [94].…”
Section: G Antenna and Propagation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Work in [75] shows that received power of wideband 73 GHz signals has a stationary mean over slight movements but average power can change by 25 dB as the mobile transitioned a building cornor from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) to LOS in an urban microcell (UMi) environment [88], [94]. Measurements at 10, 20 and 26 GHz demonstrate that diffraction loss can be predicted using well-known models as a mobile moves around a corner using directional antennas [95], and human body blockage causes more than 40 dB of fading [88], [94].…”
Section: G Antenna and Propagation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitive challenge for a 5G channel model is to provide a fundamental physical basis, while being flexible, and accurate, especially across a wide frequency range such as 0.5 GHz to 100 GHz. Recently, a great deal of research aimed at understanding the propagation mechanisms and channel behavior at the frequencies above 6 GHz has been published [3], [4], [12]- [32], [40], [60], [73], [75], [78], [81], [83], [84], [89]- [95], [101]- [111]. The specific types of antennas used and numbers of measurements collected vary widely and may generally be found in the referenced work.…”
Section: Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Based on (1) and (2), the diffraction power gain G(ν) in dB produced in a knife edge by the KED model is expressed as [17], [34]:…”
Section: ) Ked Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate the computation of G(α), a simple linear model (7) based on minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimation between the model and measured data was proposed in [36] to estimate the diffraction loss caused by a curved surface at a single frequency, based on the creeping wave linear model [17], [32]:…”
Section: ) Ked Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms have shown a substantial impact on mmWaves [45], [51], [145]. Due to the short wavelengths of mmWave signals, ranging between 1 mm and 10 mm, their propagation mechanisms are drastically different from those the sub-3 GHz, and hence have to be carefully studied and modeled to understand the mmWave channel.…”
Section: F Propagation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%