2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18124462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Bluetooth Low Energy Dataset for Localization, Tracking, Occupancy, and Social Interaction

Abstract: Indoor localization has become a mature research area, but further scientific developments are limited due to the lack of open datasets and corresponding frameworks suitable to compare and evaluate specialized localization solutions. Although several competitions provide datasets and environments for comparing different solutions, they hardly consider novel technologies such as Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), which is gaining more and more importance in indoor localization due to its wide availability in personal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many technical solutions are found to be used for indoor localization, which can be classified into five categories: (1) wireless communication, (2) optical/visual, (3) acoustic, (4) electromagnetic, and (5) inertial measurement [9,17]. Despite some technical solutions being competitive in terms of accuracy, such as ultrasound and optical/visual techniques, they still present problems in their adoption due to the cost of additional equipment and difficulties in the deployment and maintenance of dedicated infrastructure [18]. Therefore, the most commonly used techniques for indoor localization are: WiFi, UWB, RFID, and inertial measurement.…”
Section: Indoor Localization Techniques: the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many technical solutions are found to be used for indoor localization, which can be classified into five categories: (1) wireless communication, (2) optical/visual, (3) acoustic, (4) electromagnetic, and (5) inertial measurement [9,17]. Despite some technical solutions being competitive in terms of accuracy, such as ultrasound and optical/visual techniques, they still present problems in their adoption due to the cost of additional equipment and difficulties in the deployment and maintenance of dedicated infrastructure [18]. Therefore, the most commonly used techniques for indoor localization are: WiFi, UWB, RFID, and inertial measurement.…”
Section: Indoor Localization Techniques: the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of using image processing to allow indoor localisation is provided in [12]. Finally, the research works presented in [13]- [17] study the use of Bluetooth technology to develop IPS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many proposed BLE RSSI-based ranging and fingerprinting systems often use RSSI from all three advertising channels together to obtain an aggregate signal [2][3][4]. However, the signals have been shown to exhibit different overall path-loss models and are affected by multipath fading and attenuation differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%