2020
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2020.1747537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor human face following with environmental fisheye cameras and blimp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, existing aerial platforms have not developed the smooth and safe indoor operations necessary for human interaction. Existing drones like quadcopters are still notoriously unsatisfactory in aspects including safety and endurance [5]- [8]. For example, mini drones usually exhibit sub-ten minute flight times [9], and require cages and netted enclosures for safe indoor operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, existing aerial platforms have not developed the smooth and safe indoor operations necessary for human interaction. Existing drones like quadcopters are still notoriously unsatisfactory in aspects including safety and endurance [5]- [8]. For example, mini drones usually exhibit sub-ten minute flight times [9], and require cages and netted enclosures for safe indoor operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only the altitude-related modeling and control was considered in [28]- [30]. Our previous work [10] and the recent paper [8] decomposed the movement of the blimp into a set of motion primitives, and designed the waypoint controllers by combining the primitive movements. Similarly, the recent work [31] designed flight controllers for the decoupled vertical and planar motions of an indoor blimp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%