2007
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor/Outdoor Relationships, Trends, and Carbonaceous Content of Fine Particulate Matter in Retirement Homes of the Los Angeles Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
66
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of these local peaks due to cooking, the magnitudes and trends of indoor and outdoor particle concentrations closely track each other, with indoor levels always lower than outdoor levels, which suggest that the majority of indoor particles in that site originate from outdoors. This is also confirmed by the findings of a recent study conducted at the same RC and during the same time period (Polidori et al 2007), which showed that outdoor sources of PM 2.5 and its carbonaceous components (e.g., organic and elemental carbon) are the most important contributors to the indoor PM levels. …”
Section: Particle Number and Surface Concentration In Different Locatsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the exception of these local peaks due to cooking, the magnitudes and trends of indoor and outdoor particle concentrations closely track each other, with indoor levels always lower than outdoor levels, which suggest that the majority of indoor particles in that site originate from outdoors. This is also confirmed by the findings of a recent study conducted at the same RC and during the same time period (Polidori et al 2007), which showed that outdoor sources of PM 2.5 and its carbonaceous components (e.g., organic and elemental carbon) are the most important contributors to the indoor PM levels. …”
Section: Particle Number and Surface Concentration In Different Locatsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Two identical sampling stations were installed here, one indoors and one outdoors. The indoor station was situated in the dining room of the community's main building where cooking activities, which regularly occurred between 6:00 and 9:00 in the morning, were shown to be the major indoor sources of PM 2.5 throughout the year (Polidori et al 2007). The average air exchange rate was quite low at this location (0.31 h −1 ± 0.10 for winter), which is consistent with the structural characteristics of the sampling site (a dining hall in the middle of the retirement homes), the low number of open windows and doors, and the presence of central air conditioners.…”
Section: Sampling Sites and Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of indoor and outdoor particulate matter was examined in several environments [27][28][29][30][31][32] and the reported results strongly associated the indoor PM concentration with the outdoor one. In respect to particle dynamics and using mass balance models, the authors managed to determine deposition indoors and penetration from outdoors, although the variability of the results indicated the strong dependence on assumptions, different methodologies and building characteristics [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlike coarse particles and fine particles (PM 2.5 , or accumulation plus ultrafine), which are naturally divided by a cutpoint of 2.5 µm and have clearly different origins. We estimated outdoor secondary OC (SOC) and primary OC (OC pri ) from total OC as detailed in our recent publica tion (Polidori et al 2007) and summarized in the Supplemental Material (doi:10.1289/ ehp.0800194.S1). OC pri is representative of particles emitted directly from combustion sources (mostly fossil fuels in the LA basin), whereas SOC represents semivolatile and low volatile products of photochemical reactions involving reactive organic gases from anthro pogenic and biogenic sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement methods are more thoroughly described in the Supplemental Material (doi:10.1289/ ehp.0800194.S1). Hourly outdoor home air pollutants were measured over 9 days before each blood draw as described elsewhere (Arhami et al 2006;Polidori et al 2007). These meas urements included pollutant gases [carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides-nitrogen dioxide (NO x -NO 2 ), ozone], total PN (condensa tion particle counter model 3785; TSI Inc, Shoreview, MN), PM 2.5 organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) (OC_EC analyzer model 3F; Sunset Laboratory Inc., Tigard, OR), and black carbon (BC) (aethalometer; Magee Scientific, Berkeley, CA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%