2009
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2009.2020703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Power Harvesting Using Photovoltaic Cells for Low-Power Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PV energy harvesting approaches for powering applications have been compared to this work in Table IV in terms of the adoption of functional blocks of DC-DC convertor, MPPT and illumination restrictions. Compared to other powering applications, such as powering indoor low-power system with MPPT [14], using assumption of fixed indoor illumination to exempt MTTP [26] and the "storage-less and converter-less" strategy with MPPT for powering the IoT [21], the simple charger power management scheme employed in the newly designed IPEHPM provides a DC-DC convertor-free and MPPT-free solution, enabling powering IoT nodes using PV energy harvesting at all indoor illumination conditions with the minimum power consumption. Fig.12 (refer to time from 8 to 22 hours) is slightly nonlinear.…”
Section: B Experiments Set-up and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PV energy harvesting approaches for powering applications have been compared to this work in Table IV in terms of the adoption of functional blocks of DC-DC convertor, MPPT and illumination restrictions. Compared to other powering applications, such as powering indoor low-power system with MPPT [14], using assumption of fixed indoor illumination to exempt MTTP [26] and the "storage-less and converter-less" strategy with MPPT for powering the IoT [21], the simple charger power management scheme employed in the newly designed IPEHPM provides a DC-DC convertor-free and MPPT-free solution, enabling powering IoT nodes using PV energy harvesting at all indoor illumination conditions with the minimum power consumption. Fig.12 (refer to time from 8 to 22 hours) is slightly nonlinear.…”
Section: B Experiments Set-up and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under typical indoor lighting conditions (1~5 W/m 2 light intensity conditions), monocrystaline PV cells have an efficiency of less than 1%~3%, while amorphous PV cells are more sensitive to different wavelengths, so the latter exhibit higher efficiencies (3%~7%). This means that the photovoltaic cells can provide a power density ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 mW/cm 2 under indoor artificial illumination conditions [3]. In view of the typically constant illumination conditions of indoor applications, the maximum power point can be easily determined and the maximum power point tracking circuit in the power management system can be simplified substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, PV cells provide a fairly stable DC voltage through much of their operating space Roundy et al (2004). Various works utilizing solar harvesting/scavenging techniques demonstrated the suitable of indoor PV in supplying alternate energy to small, low-power consuming devices, complemented with batteries within the system Hande et al (2007), Nasiri et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%