1999
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Radiation Measurements in Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the radiological impact on the workers due to waterborne 222 Rn inhalation, the mean contribution of the water 222 Rn in the indoor air concentrations was evaluated, based on a transfer coefficient from water to air of 2.7Â10 23 (19,24) . Hence, the 222 Rn concentrations of the spa indoor installations were found to be 2611 Bq m 23 for Apollo, 362 Bq m 23 for Spilaio and 2746 Bq m 23 for Asclepiad. The annual effective dose equivalent due to inhalation was calculated using the conversion 1.5Â10 21 mSv per Bq h m 21 .…”
Section: Dosimetry Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to estimate the radiological impact on the workers due to waterborne 222 Rn inhalation, the mean contribution of the water 222 Rn in the indoor air concentrations was evaluated, based on a transfer coefficient from water to air of 2.7Â10 23 (19,24) . Hence, the 222 Rn concentrations of the spa indoor installations were found to be 2611 Bq m 23 for Apollo, 362 Bq m 23 for Spilaio and 2746 Bq m 23 for Asclepiad. The annual effective dose equivalent due to inhalation was calculated using the conversion 1.5Â10 21 mSv per Bq h m 21 .…”
Section: Dosimetry Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Internal dose rates due to waterborne 222 Rn inhalation. The annual effective dose equivalent due to 222 Rn inhalation was calculated using the factor 1.4Â10 25 mSv per Bq h m 23 , on the assumption of a mean total stay in the indoor place of the installations 45 min for a mean number of 10 therapies. The results are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Case C: Radiological Impact On Bathersmentioning
confidence: 99%