2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor-to-outdoor pollutant concentration ratio modeling of CO2, NO2, and lung-deposited nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of air pollution, previous studies addressed that indoor environment such as PM 10 and NO 2 in Seoul are very dependent on outdoor condition [47]. For example, indoor to outdoor ratios for PM 10 and NO 2 were 0.69 and 1.05, respectively [4748]. This indicates that even if we considered indoor levels for PM 10 and NO 2 , the effect of these factors would be similar as shown in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of air pollution, previous studies addressed that indoor environment such as PM 10 and NO 2 in Seoul are very dependent on outdoor condition [47]. For example, indoor to outdoor ratios for PM 10 and NO 2 were 0.69 and 1.05, respectively [4748]. This indicates that even if we considered indoor levels for PM 10 and NO 2 , the effect of these factors would be similar as shown in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we did not consider the indoor NO 2 level, despite the fact that children spend most of their time indoors. However, traffic emissions are the major source of NO 2 in Seoul, and indoor NO 2 level is very dependent on outdoor conditions [39]. Therefore, presumably, it had no significant impact on the results, although our study did not evaluate the exposure to indoor NO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Indoor concentrations were the largest contributor to overall individual exposure, particularly in the city with the highest outdoor concentrations, and thus focus on improved estimation of ambient-source indoor exposures is warranted. Studies in a variety of U.S. cities have examined the effect of various housing characteristics on AERs 29 , 30 , 37 , 38 and I/O ratios of NO 2 , 39 and report AERs ranging from 0.36 h −1 in North Carolina during the summer 29 to 1.92 h −1 in Michigan during the summer. 30 In a sensitivity analysis, variation in AER altered the proportion of overall exposure due to the indoor microenvironment, though even with the lowest AER the mean contribution of the indoor microenvironment remained greater than 50%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%