2014
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced and Constitutive DNA Methylation in a Salinity-Tolerant Wheat Introgression Line

Abstract: Cytosine methylation is a well recognized epigenetic mark. Here, the methylation status of a salinity-tolerant wheat cultivar (cv. SR3, derived from a somatic hybridization event) and its progenitor parent (cv. JN177) was explored both globally and within a set of 24 genes responsive to salinity stress. A further comparison was made between DNA extracted from plants grown under control conditions and when challenged by salinity stress. The SR3 and JN177 genomes differed with respect to their global methylation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
82
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although considered relatively tolerant to salinity [5], barley grown of the genome. Of the many methods available, Methylation Sensitive Amplification Polymorphism (MSAP) analysis has proved particularly popular to study stress-induced changes to genome-wide methylation patterns [25,27,32], in part because of the reproducible reputation of the technique [39][40][41]. However, the MSAP method only generates relatively small numbers of anonymous markers [42,43] and so has limited utility for studies aiming to establish links between changes in methylation and altered gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although considered relatively tolerant to salinity [5], barley grown of the genome. Of the many methods available, Methylation Sensitive Amplification Polymorphism (MSAP) analysis has proved particularly popular to study stress-induced changes to genome-wide methylation patterns [25,27,32], in part because of the reproducible reputation of the technique [39][40][41]. However, the MSAP method only generates relatively small numbers of anonymous markers [42,43] and so has limited utility for studies aiming to establish links between changes in methylation and altered gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MSAP method only generates relatively small numbers of anonymous markers [42,43] and so has limited utility for studies aiming to establish links between changes in methylation and altered gene expression. While some works have sought to overcome this limitation by targeted sequencing of MSAP amplicons [7,25,32,33], others have argued that this amendment of the method is still cumbersome, costly and time-consuming [44]. The ability of Next Generation Sequencing to analyse large numbers of loci in multiple methylomes in parallel provides the opportunity to overcome these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salt stress induced shift in DNA methylation in both the promoter and coding regions of some of the 24 selected genes, but only the former were associated with changes in transcript (Wang et al, 2014). Similarly, in another study where two cultivars with different level of salt tolerances were evaluated, dose dependent genome-wide DNA hypomethylation was observed in salt stress conditions (Zhong et al, 2009).…”
Section: Salinitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In wheat, shift in the DNA methylationdue to salinity stress, in salinity tolerant cultivar and its salinity sensitive progenitor, has been recently reported (Wang et al, 2014). Salt stress induced shift in DNA methylation in both the promoter and coding regions of some of the 24 selected genes, but only the former were associated with changes in transcript (Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Salinitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A BBPI was shown to be involved in the tolerance to salt stress in wheat (Shan et al 2008) and Arabidopsis (Wang et al 2014). BBPI was up regulated by water deficit in peanut leaves (Dramé et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%