1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.14510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced spin polarization inV:FenVmsuperlattices and thin V films on Fe substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that the magnetic moment of the Fe layer did not change when the measuring temperature was changed from 300 K to 2 K. It means for this kind of samples the size effect at room temperature is so small that its influence could be omitted when T was changed from 300 K to 2 K. Thus a conclusion can be derived that in the present work the reduction of -1.5(±0.1) µ B mentioned above is mainly due to the contribution of the two Fe/V interfaces. Assuming that both interfaces are equal, well then, the reduction of the magnetic moment at each Fe/V interface is -0.75(±0.05) µ B (about 35% compared with the Fe bulk value), which is in agreement with the theoretical calculations [Ham84,Izq99] and the experimental results [Hos84,Tom97,Wal94]. However, the PNR data cannot distinguish between an antiparallel alignment of the V atoms or a reduced magnetic moment of the interfacial Fe layer.…”
Section: Figure 412 (A) the Influence Of The Roughness Of The Vanadisupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The result showed that the magnetic moment of the Fe layer did not change when the measuring temperature was changed from 300 K to 2 K. It means for this kind of samples the size effect at room temperature is so small that its influence could be omitted when T was changed from 300 K to 2 K. Thus a conclusion can be derived that in the present work the reduction of -1.5(±0.1) µ B mentioned above is mainly due to the contribution of the two Fe/V interfaces. Assuming that both interfaces are equal, well then, the reduction of the magnetic moment at each Fe/V interface is -0.75(±0.05) µ B (about 35% compared with the Fe bulk value), which is in agreement with the theoretical calculations [Ham84,Izq99] and the experimental results [Hos84,Tom97,Wal94]. However, the PNR data cannot distinguish between an antiparallel alignment of the V atoms or a reduced magnetic moment of the interfacial Fe layer.…”
Section: Figure 412 (A) the Influence Of The Roughness Of The Vanadisupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Assuming that both interfaces are equal, then the reduction of the magnetic moment at each Fe/V interface is -0.75(±0.05) µ B (about 35% compared with the Fe bulk value). This value is well in agreement with the theoretical calculations [Ham84,Izq99]. Moreover, a strong deviation from the fit line was found for the data point of the sample with an Fe thick-ness of 0.3 nm.…”
Section: Chapter 6 Summarysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations