Cell-type-specific and inducible alternative splicing has a fundamental impact on regulating gene expression and cellular function in a variety of settings, including activation and differentiation. We have recently shown that activationinduced skipping of TRAF3 exon 8 activates noncanonical NF-B signaling upon T cell stimulation, but the regulatory basis for this splicing event remains unknown. Here we identify cis-and trans-regulatory elements rendering this splicing switch activation dependent and cell type specific. The cis-acting element is located 340 to 440 nucleotides upstream of the regulated exon and acts in a distance-dependent manner, since altering the location reduces its activity. A small interfering RNA screen, followed by cross-link immunoprecipitation and mutational analyses, identified CELF2 and hnRNP C as trans-acting factors that directly bind the regulatory sequence and together mediate increased exon skipping in activated T cells. CELF2 expression levels correlate with TRAF3 exon skipping in several model systems, suggesting that CELF2 is the decisive factor, with hnRNP C being necessary but not sufficient. These data suggest an interplay between CELF2 and hnRNP C as the mechanistic basis for activation-dependent alternative splicing of TRAF3 exon 8 and additional exons and uncover an intronic splicing silencer whose full activity depends on the precise location more than 300 nucleotides upstream of the regulated exon.KEYWORDS RNA binding proteins, RNA splicing S plicing-sensitive microarrays and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) technologies have led to the accumulation of enormous amounts of gene expression data from different cell types and tissues under various conditions. Such analyses have led to the conclusion that the majority of human genes are alternatively spliced and have shown strong differences in global splicing patterns under different conditions (1-3). Although these differences suggest a substantial contribution of alternative splicing to the regulation of gene expression, studies connecting alternative splicing and functionality are rare. Consequently, a functional impact of individual alternative splicing events on cellular functionality was demonstrated for only a few examples (4-7), and the function of most alternative splicing events remains unknown. However, a recent large-scale approach demonstrated that splice-isoforms of the same gene often have distinct protein-protein interaction profiles, further supporting the notion of distinct functionality (8).Another largely open question concerns splicing regulation: how are cell-typespecific splicing patterns established and maintained? Despite the identification of