2015
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2014.2313659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inducing Niching Behavior in Differential Evolution Through Local Information Sharing

Abstract: In practical situations it is very often desirable to detect multiple optimally sustainable solutions of an optimization problem. The population-based evolutionary multimodal optimization algorithms can be very helpful in such cases. They detect and maintain multiple optimal solutions during the run by incorporating specialized niching operations to aid the parallel localized convergence of population members around different basins of attraction. This paper presents an improved information sharing mechanism a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see a common feature among most of these PSO, DE, and ES niching algorithms, that is, the need to identify nearest neighbourhood best points with respect to a current point in the population, e.g., FER-PSO [33], LIPS [34], DE/nrand/1 [52], dADE/nrand/1 [53], LoINDE [56], a DE using a proximity mutation operator [50], a Local selectionbased DE [49], and NEA2 (Niching with CMA-ES via NBC) [95]. These neighbourhood best points can be subsequently used to attract individuals in their respective neighbourhoods, in order to achieve the niching effect.…”
Section: Discussion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can see a common feature among most of these PSO, DE, and ES niching algorithms, that is, the need to identify nearest neighbourhood best points with respect to a current point in the population, e.g., FER-PSO [33], LIPS [34], DE/nrand/1 [52], dADE/nrand/1 [53], LoINDE [56], a DE using a proximity mutation operator [50], a Local selectionbased DE [49], and NEA2 (Niching with CMA-ES via NBC) [95]. These neighbourhood best points can be subsequently used to attract individuals in their respective neighbourhoods, in order to achieve the niching effect.…”
Section: Discussion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Biswas et al [56] recently proposed three niching DE variants by incorporating a probabilistic parent selection scheme based on fitness and proximity information, known as localized shared information. More specifically, parent selection in the mutation stage is replaced by a probabilistic scheme to increase the probability of selecting fitter individuals that are closer to the target vector.…”
Section: B Differential Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the time complexity caused by pairwise distance calculations, the work [27] proposes a fast niching technique by introducing the locality sensitive hashing, which is an efficient algorithm for approximately retrieving nearest neighbors. An improved information-sharing mechanism among individuals is introduced in [28] to induce more stable and efficient niching behavior, and a newly proposed parent-centric mutation operator is combined with a synchronous crowding replacement rule in [29]. Besides niching methods, new paths to gain the multimodal optimization ability are established.…”
Section: > Replace This Line With Your Paper Identification Number mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DE/rand/1 operator is one of the most commonly used DE variants [62], and all different solutions are randomly chosen from the population. So, this strategy does not generate biased or special search directions, and then a new direction is selected at random each time.…”
Section: De/rand/1mentioning
confidence: 99%