Community" in social networks is a nebulous concept. A community is generally assumed to be formed by people who possess similar attributes or characteristics, also known as "homophily". Although there has been a lot of research on community detection based on network topology, the semantic interpretation of communities is rarely studied. The present work aims to understand the behavioural similarity of users present in their personal neighbourhood communities formed by friends, relatives, or colleagues, and addresses two fundamental questions: (i) Are communities formed by users who possess similar behavioural traits? If so, does this apply to all those sub-networks, i.e., friends, relatives, and colleagues? (ii) Does adding behavioural node-specific attributes/features to the nodes in a network lead to better community detection? To better understand the psycho-sociological homophilic nature of personal networks, the personalities and values of Twitter users were analysed using the well-established "Big-5 personality model" and "Schwartz sociological behaviour model". Empirical results based on the psycho-sociological behaviour show that friends networks exhibit homophily, whereas relatives and colleagues networks do not exhibit such homophilic behaviour. It can also be observed that neurotic people tend to behave heterogeneously with people of various personality traits. In addition, it is shown that such empirical evidence can be used as features for the tasks of community detection and link prediction.