1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00004459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction and duration of tonic immobility in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris

Abstract: Tonic immobility (TI) is an unlearned behavioral response characterized by a state of immobility and torpor. Effect of inter-trial interval on duration of tonic immobility was assessed in thirty, juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris). Regression analyses showed that massed trials of 12 per session increased the average duration of tonic immobility by 475 sec compared to spaced trials of 1 per session. Each experiment was composed of 24 trials. TI is stable and durations much longer in the lemon shark … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Time between hooking and boating specimens was minimized (i.e., < 1 min). Sharks were subjected to tonic immobility during manual handling according to the method of Watsky and Gruber [1990]. Following the advice of Keyes (personal communication), the animals were transferred by boat in a 1.3-m-diameter, hemispherical, fiberglass, water-filled vessel, avoiding damage to their eyes and cephalofoil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time between hooking and boating specimens was minimized (i.e., < 1 min). Sharks were subjected to tonic immobility during manual handling according to the method of Watsky and Gruber [1990]. Following the advice of Keyes (personal communication), the animals were transferred by boat in a 1.3-m-diameter, hemispherical, fiberglass, water-filled vessel, avoiding damage to their eyes and cephalofoil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shark capture, tagging and passive monitoring Juvenile lemon sharks were angled from Page, Kemps, and Broad Creek using conventional spinning gear and baited hooks (10-15 lb test, 5/0 or 7/0 circle hooks) between November 2005 and May 2007. Upon capture, tonic immobility was induced by restraining the shark and rapidly inverting it onto its back (see Watsky and Gruber 1990) to facilitate the implantation of an ultrasonic transmitter (model V16-4 L coded tags, 16 mm diameter, 52 mm long, 9 g, Vemco Inc., Shad Bay, NS). For implantation, a small (2-3 cm) incision was made to the left side of the ventral midline, anterior to the pelvic fins.…”
Section: Study Site and Hydrophone Array Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sharks were captured, handled, and released in accordance with Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries regulations. Once landed, each shark was removed from the water, the hook was removed (if possible), and tonic immobility was induced by restraining the shark ventral side up in a V-shaped table lined with pre-wetted neoprene (Watsky & Gruber 1990). All sharks captured through out the study period were tagged externally with conventional NMFS shark tags (Kohler & Turner 2001), and a subset was tagged internally with individually coded acoustic transmitters (2008 and 2009: model V16-4L [nominal Vemco Division, AMIRIX Systems).…”
Section: Shark Capture and Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%