2012
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.4837
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction Chemotherapy and Dose Intensification of the Radiation Boost in Locally Advanced Anal Canal Carcinoma: Final Analysis of the Randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 Trial

Abstract: Using CFS as our main end point, we did not find an advantage for either ICT or HD radiation boost in LAACC. Nevertheless, the results of the most treatment-intense arm B should prompt the design of further intensification studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
194
3
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
16
194
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that the 3-step approach may not provide additional benefit to CCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This is also in line with data from anal cancer, which showed that induction chemotherapy may worsen local tumor control compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (23). Although the systemic failure rate was numerically lower in the induction chemotherapy group (19.1% vs 34.0%), this did not translate into a survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results suggest that the 3-step approach may not provide additional benefit to CCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This is also in line with data from anal cancer, which showed that induction chemotherapy may worsen local tumor control compared with chemoradiotherapy alone (23). Although the systemic failure rate was numerically lower in the induction chemotherapy group (19.1% vs 34.0%), this did not translate into a survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This report on the use of SIB-IMRT with capecitabine and MMC for anal carcinoma shows that the efficacy is similar as in recent larger series using conventional radiation techniques [18][19][20]. This is also in accordance with a recently published smaller retrospective series, using SIB-IMRT with 5-FU instead of capecitabine [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In our series, the indication for colostomy was restricted to patients with persistent or recurrent disease, whereas in the literature, some trials described different cases in which a more radical approach, including colostomy, was necessary to treat CRT-related complications [5][6]17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become the international preferred treatment, due to its clinical evidence demonstrating improved outcomes, better tolerability and considerable complete response avoiding a permanent colostomy [2][3][4] . In the last decade, different chemotherapy (CHT) regimens, as well as novel radiotherapy techniques have been tested to improve treatment efficacy and reduce morbidity [5][6][7][8][9] . Several surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS) have been used, mainly due to the necessity of reducing trial duration and patient number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%