2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01574-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of c-Fos expression in specific areas of the fear circuitry in rat forebrain by anxiogenic drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
209
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
23
209
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Local infusion of a D1 receptor antagonist into the PFC blocked footshockinduced reinstatement suggesting that such reinstatement could result from enhanced dopaminergic activity in the PFC (Capriles et al, 2003). Yohimbine activates a number of brain regions that are also activated by footshock, including the nucleus accumbens, the VTA and the PFC (Funk et al, 2006;Singewald et al, 2003). This latter finding, coupled with the effectiveness of dopamine receptor blockade in the PFC to reverse footshock-induced reinstatement, is intriguing in light of the fact that Ro60-0175 reduces the stressinduced rise in extracellular dopamine in the PFC (Pozzi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local infusion of a D1 receptor antagonist into the PFC blocked footshockinduced reinstatement suggesting that such reinstatement could result from enhanced dopaminergic activity in the PFC (Capriles et al, 2003). Yohimbine activates a number of brain regions that are also activated by footshock, including the nucleus accumbens, the VTA and the PFC (Funk et al, 2006;Singewald et al, 2003). This latter finding, coupled with the effectiveness of dopamine receptor blockade in the PFC to reverse footshock-induced reinstatement, is intriguing in light of the fact that Ro60-0175 reduces the stressinduced rise in extracellular dopamine in the PFC (Pozzi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS is a prime candidate for modulation of maternal defense by BDZs because it is associated with fear and anxiety (Numan and Insel, 2003;Pesold and Treit, 1996;Singewald et al, 2003) and previously has been hypothesized to be a critical site of negative regulation for maternal aggression (D'Anna et al, 2005;Gammie et al, 2004). For example, for three peptides that inhibit maternal aggression, CRF (Gammie et al, 2004), urocotin (Ucn) 1, and Ucn 3 (D' Anna et al, 2005), c-Fos activity in LS was elevated with treatment at the dose that impaired aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain regions analyzed for the number of c-Fos-ir nuclei were chosen based on previous studies implicating them in fear circuitry (Singewald and Sharp, 2000;Singewald et al, 2003) and central autonomic and/or osmotic regulation (see reviews (Johnson and Gross, 1993;Dampney, 1994)). Analysis of the number of c-Fos-ir nuclei in all brain regions analyzed using two-factor ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a lactate (F (1,19) …”
Section: Experiments 1: Cellular Responses In L-or D-ag Rats Followingmentioning
confidence: 99%