2019
DOI: 10.1080/01480545.2019.1643876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of chromosomal and DNA damage and histological alterations by graphene oxide nanoparticles in Swiss mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could lead to DNA damage and probably to the accumulation of DNA mutations 74 . Preliminary evidence already exists for DNA damage generated by different GRMs 75 77 and it is worth highlighting the relevance of lateral size, oxidation, dose, etc. in DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to DNA damage and probably to the accumulation of DNA mutations 74 . Preliminary evidence already exists for DNA damage generated by different GRMs 75 77 and it is worth highlighting the relevance of lateral size, oxidation, dose, etc. in DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the dose of GO nanoparticle, a significant increase in micronuclei and DNA damage was reported in the study group mice compared to the control group mice. In addition, it has been reported that apoptosis, necrosis, inflammations, and cell degeneration in the liver and brain tissue sections, including histological lesions [25]. Overall these studies indicate that high concentration of GBMs, extended incubation times, dose-depended and ultra-sharp edges cause genotoxicity in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thirteen studies, published in seven papers, assessed the in vivo genotoxicity of graphene ( Table 7 ). Among them, ten studied the effect of GO [ 60 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ], two of rGO [ 97 , 100 ] and one of exfoliated graphene [ 91 ]. Regarding graphene material characterization, it was not found in two of the publications; in the others, the amount of information was not the same among different studies but, in general, lateral size, z-potential, and hydrodynamic diameter are provided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%