1975
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(75)90083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of drinking by insulin in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether or not GLP-1R agonists affect sodium intake remains a topic for further investigation. Although insulin affects water intake, the direction of insulin's effect makes it unlikely that this explains GLP-1R-mediated hypodipsia because administration of insulin increases, rather than decreases, water intake in the absence of food (39). Increased blood pressure inhibits water intake (33), but the time course of the pressor response to GLP-1 and the suppression of intake do not support changes in blood pressure as a more direct cause of the observed effects on water intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whether or not GLP-1R agonists affect sodium intake remains a topic for further investigation. Although insulin affects water intake, the direction of insulin's effect makes it unlikely that this explains GLP-1R-mediated hypodipsia because administration of insulin increases, rather than decreases, water intake in the absence of food (39). Increased blood pressure inhibits water intake (33), but the time course of the pressor response to GLP-1 and the suppression of intake do not support changes in blood pressure as a more direct cause of the observed effects on water intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This effect is unlikely to contribute to the observed effects, however, because any loss of water or NaCl would lead to increased, rather than decreased, fluid intake. Similarly, GLP‐1 enhances glucose‐stimulated insulin release but insulin increases water intake , which makes this another unlikely explanation for the present results. A more plausible possibility is that the observed effects are related to the pressor response of GLP‐1R agonists .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%