1975
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90009-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations by simian virus 40 in cultured mammalian cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-random nature of viral integration and the potential for integration events to cause toxicity and cancer have long been realized [17,18]. However, a formal VIS hot-spot definition was not described until the turn of the century when Suzuki et al (2002) developed a definition for retroviral integration in cancer cells to discover potential cancer-related genes [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-random nature of viral integration and the potential for integration events to cause toxicity and cancer have long been realized [17,18]. However, a formal VIS hot-spot definition was not described until the turn of the century when Suzuki et al (2002) developed a definition for retroviral integration in cancer cells to discover potential cancer-related genes [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of especial interest is the fact that the transformation character under study (ser-+ser+) is induced by the oncogenic virus SV40. In our previous studies of viral mutagenesis (Marshak et al, 1975;Varshaver et al, 1977) we have hypothesized that the viruses might cause malignant transformation by inducing mutations in the relevant genes. The data presented in this study seem to support that possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented in this study seem to support that possibility. A comparison of the values of induction of ser+ variants and HPRT++HPRT-mu-tations after infection with SV40 shows them to be roughly equal (Marshak et al, 1973(Marshak et al, , 1975. Another important fact is that the induction of ser+ variants was detected after 3-4 days expression time, which is typical of gene mutations (Marshak et al, 1975;Varshaver et al, 1977;Bellett and Younghusband, 1979;Landolph and Heidelberger, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which any potential mutagenic activity of SV40 is related to its transforming activity is unknown. A number of studies have shown that SV40 infection of nonpermissive and semipermissive cell lines results in chromosomal changes, such as polyploidization (7,8) and chromosomal breaks and rearrangements (8,12,29), and in somatic mutations at different loci (12,24,25,27,28). The observation that some cells transformed by SV40 have altered karyotypes (9, 29) led to the suggestion that polyploidization may be involved in the process of malignant transformation (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%