“…The strength of this critically appraised topic is in the extensive search; the participation of patients with alopecia in determining and rating the outcome measures; and the thorough Aghaei, 15 Ashworth et al, 16 Avgerinou et al, 17 Berth-Jones and Hutchinson, 18 Cotellessa et al, 19 Firooz et al, 20 Gordon et al, 21 Monk 15 Ashworth et al, 16 Avgerinou et al, 17 Berth-Jones and Hutchinson, 18 Cotellessa et al, 19 Gordon et al, 21 Monk, 22 Schuttelaar et al, 14 Aghaei, 15 Avgerinou et al, 17 Firooz et al, 20 Monk, 22 Schuttelaar et al, 14 van der Steen et al 23 k Aghaei, 15 Avgerinou et al, 17 Cotellessa et al, 19 Hunter et al, 25 van der Steen et al, 23 Schuttelaar et al 14 l Avgerinou et al, 17 Berth-Jones and Hutchinson, 18 Hunter et al, 25 Schuttelaar et al 14 application of the GRADE method with detailed evaluation and reporting, which included a risk of bias assessment of individual studies, as well grading the quality of evidence for each outcome taking into account any limitations in study design or execution inconsistencies in the results, indirectness of the evidence, imprecision and publication bias. The British Association of Dermatologists' guideline on AA only included studies up to 2001 and did not perform a critical appraisal of the included studies.…”