2000
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.1.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Permanent Mixed Chimerism and Skin Allograft Tolerance Across Fully MHC-Mismatched Barriers by the Additional Myelosuppressive Treatments in Mice Primed with Allogeneic Spleen Cells Followed by Cyclophosphamide

Abstract: A pure method of drug (cyclophosphamide plus busulfan)-induced skin allograft tolerance in mice that can regularly overcome fully H-2-mismatched barriers in mice has been established. The components of the method are i.v. administration of 1 × 108 allogeneic spleen cells on day 0, i.p. injection of 200 mg/kg CP and 25 mg/kg busulfan on day 2, and i.v. injection of T cell-depleted 1 × 107 bone marrow cells from the same donor on day 3. Recipient B10 (H-2b; IE−) mice prepared with this conditioning developed don… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skin grafts were prepared and transplanted as previously described by Ref. 35 Briefly, full-thickness tail skin (0.8 Â 0.8 cm) was grafted onto the lateral flank of recipient mice. A suture was sewn onto each corner of the graft and subsequently bandaged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin grafts were prepared and transplanted as previously described by Ref. 35 Briefly, full-thickness tail skin (0.8 Â 0.8 cm) was grafted onto the lateral flank of recipient mice. A suture was sewn onto each corner of the graft and subsequently bandaged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could surmise that researchers in the field have a pre-determined bias (full tolerance is the preferred outcome clinically), as evidenced by the numerous studies that chose to use clinically irrelevant MHC-congenic donors (minor antigen-matched) that are likely to give a false impression of full tolerance (skin acceptance) [16,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44], including in protocols very similar to our own [45]. No explanation is given in such studies for the unusual choice of donor/recipient combination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While split tolerance has been observed in some mixed chimerism strategies [7, 13], many current studies are specifically designed to avoid the issue by using donor and recipient combinations matched for minor histocompatibility antigens [14][15][16][17][18]. The prevention of split tolerance by minor antigen matching could result from a number of mechanisms, including reduced indirect reactivity to the donor or elimination of allelic tissuespecific antigens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…injection of 1 Â 10 8 allogeneic spleen cells (SC) (day 0) followed, 2 days later, by an i.p. administration of 200 mg/kg of CP in mice [7][8][9][10]. By using the H-2-matched murine combination of AKR into C3H and MoAbs against the T-cell markers (Thy1.1 and Thy1.2) and Mls-a reactive TCR Vb6, we have demonstrated the concurrent mechanisms of CP-induced tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms are: (i) clonal destruction of antigenstimulated and then proliferating T cells by CP [8,9], (ii) establishment of stable mixed chimerism [11], (iii) intrathymic clonal deletion [8,9] and (iv) and regulatory mechanisms at the late stage of tolerance [12]. Recently, we have developed a modified method that includes additional myelosuppressive treatments and induces both permanent mixed chimerism and skin allograft tolerance in H-2 mismatched combinations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%