1996
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1656(95)00150-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of protective immunity by aerosol or oral application of candidate vaccines in a dose-controlled pig aerosol infection model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BALT might have been the entry site for live or attenuated Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae applied as a vaccine in aerosol form which protected the pigs from a considerable dose of these bacteria in an exposure [44]. After infection of pigs with Mycoplasma hyopneumonia, hyperplasia of BALT is the most significant change.…”
Section: Porcinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BALT might have been the entry site for live or attenuated Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae applied as a vaccine in aerosol form which protected the pigs from a considerable dose of these bacteria in an exposure [44]. After infection of pigs with Mycoplasma hyopneumonia, hyperplasia of BALT is the most significant change.…”
Section: Porcinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional studies on lymphocyte traffic revealed major differences in the extent of immigrating lymphocytes: large numbers of lymphocytes immigrate into JPP, whereas little cell traffic is found in the IPP with the exception of the 10 to 20 cm next to the ileocecal junction where entry is as high as in JPP [87]. The protective effect of the orally applied lungspecific bacterium Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in a subsequent aerosol exposure of an LD 50 of this bacterium can be taken as an example of the integrated mucosal immune system and its relevance in future vaccine strategies in farm animals [44]. In a recently published study, four different subsets of dendritic cells were characterized in JPP, lamina propria, gut lymph and mesenteric lymph nodes of pigs, and the functional relevance is outlined for future vaccine studies [14].…”
Section: Histology and Lymphocyte Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also prevented colonization of the lungs and tonsils which indicated that immunization with BGs is superior to treatment with bacterins. 43 More importantly, no clinical side-effects have been reported.…”
Section: Bgs-applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mucosal application of App BGs as oral immunization 44 or as aerosols 43,45 induced sterile immunity and cross-protection against other serotypes in pigs 45 whereas intramuscular immunization 46 fully prevented the vaccinated pigs against the disease after lethal challenge but did not confer sterile immunity because the challenge bacteria could be re-isolated from the tonsils from the vaccinated pigs.…”
Section: Bgs-applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Pigs are a good model for human diseases and these studies encourage using BG aerosols also in humans (e.g., for Chlamydia pneumoniae) either as vaccine or drug carrier. The oral immunization of rabbits with V. cholerae ghosts induced protective immunity against O1 challenge in the RITARD model and conferred cross protection against the recently emerging O139 strain.…”
Section: © 2 0 0 8 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S mentioning
confidence: 99%