1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6238(99)00029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of supernumerary Ribs with sodium salicylate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
18
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kimmel and Wilson (1973) classified SNR in rat fetuses as rudimentary or extra based on whether the SNR was less than or greater than half the length of the 13th thoracic rib, respectively. Foulon et al (1999) used a value of 0.35 for the ratio between the 14th and 13th rib lengths in rats. Using our data in CD‐1 mice, we find that using a length of less than or greater than 0.6 mm gives a clear separation of rudimentary and extra ribs, as does using a ratio of 0.35 for 14th to 13th rib length, while using half the length of the 13th rib is less satisfactory (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Kimmel and Wilson (1973) classified SNR in rat fetuses as rudimentary or extra based on whether the SNR was less than or greater than half the length of the 13th thoracic rib, respectively. Foulon et al (1999) used a value of 0.35 for the ratio between the 14th and 13th rib lengths in rats. Using our data in CD‐1 mice, we find that using a length of less than or greater than 0.6 mm gives a clear separation of rudimentary and extra ribs, as does using a ratio of 0.35 for 14th to 13th rib length, while using half the length of the 13th rib is less satisfactory (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two populations of supernumerary ribs (SNR) are clearly discernible. Dashed lines represent three proposed metrics for separating the two populations of SNR, one using half the length of the ipsilateral 13th rib (Kimmel and Wilson, 1973), one using a ratio of 0.35 between the lengths of the 14th and 13th ribs (Foulon et al, 1999), and the third using an absolute cutoff length of 0.6 mm. While all three of these methods do a reasonable job of separating the populations, using a ratio of 0.35 or an actual cutoff length of 0.6 mm both do an excellent job of separation, while using half the length of the ipsilateral 13th rib is less accurate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations