Induction of systemic resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) via seed bacterization with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Elbadry, M.; Taha, Rosna Mat; El-Dougdoug, K. A.; Gamal-El-Din, H.

doi:10.1007/bf03356189

Cited by 60 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, a type of protection might be activated by SA spraying. Elbadry et al (2006) activate resistance through inhibition of some antioxidant enzymes, catalase and peroxidase, leading to production of elevated amounts of H 2 O 2 accumulation. Also, SA can play a role in protection of the chlorophyll molecules indirectly through improvement of carotenoid molecules (Radwan et al, 2007b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Protective action of salicylic acid against bean yellow mosaic virus infection in Vicia faba leaves

Radwan

Fayez

et al. 2008

Journal of Plant Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Protective action of salicylic acid against bean yellow mosaic virus infection in Vicia faba leaves

Radwan

Fayez

et al. 2008

Journal of Plant Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For simplicity, reciprocal effects (effects of P. fluorescens on other organisms) have not been included. Circled numbers refer to articles describing the interactions: (1) Jin et al (2010), (2) Gu (2009); Prieto et al (2011), (3) Elsherif and Grossmann (1996); Pedersen et al (2009), (4) Walker et al (2012), (5) Combes-Meynet et al (2011); Garbeva et al (2011), (6) Elmer (2009); Troxler et al (2012), (7) Jousset et al (2011), (8) Dicke et al (2009); Zhang et al (2013), (9) Elbadry et al (2006), (10) Jones et al (2004), and (11) Wurst (2010).…”

Section: Synthesis Application and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Getting the ecology into interactions between plants and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens

Hol¹,

Bezemer²,

Biere³

2013

Front. Plant Sci.

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are increasingly appreciated for their contributions to primary productivity through promotion of growth and triggering of induced systemic resistance in plants. Here we focus on the beneficial effects of one particular species of PGPR (Pseudomonas fluorescens) on plants through induced plant defense. This model organism has provided much understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of PGPR-induced plant defense. However, this knowledge can only be appreciated at full value once we know to what extent these mechanisms also occur under more realistic, species-diverse conditions as are occurring in the plant rhizosphere. To provide the necessary ecological context, we review the literature to compare the effect of P. fluorescens on induced plant defense when it is present as a single species or in combination with other soil dwelling species. Specifically, we discuss combinations with other plant mutualists (bacterial or fungal), plant pathogens (bacterial or fungal), bacterivores (nematode or protozoa), and decomposers. Synergistic interactions between P. fluorescens and other plant mutualists are much more commonly reported than antagonistic interactions. Recent developments have enabled screenings of P. fluorescens genomes for defense traits and this could help with selection of strains with likely positive interactions on biocontrol. However, studies that examine the effects of multiple herbivores, pathogens, or herbivores and pathogens together on the effectiveness of PGPR to induce plant defenses are underrepresented and we are not aware of any study that has examined interactions between P. fluorescens and bacterivores or decomposers. As co-occurring soil organisms can enhance but also reduce the effectiveness of PGPR, a better understanding of the biotic factors modulating P. fluorescens–plant interactions will improve the effectiveness of introducing P. fluorescens to enhance plant production and defense.

show abstract

“…There are a few reports describing application of chemical resistance inducers or resistance-inducing rhizobacteria to seeds, but with the aim to control soilborne or airborne pathogens (Benhamou et al 1994;Elbadry et al 2006). To our knowledge there are no systematic studies relating to the potential use of resistance-inducing agents against seed-borne pathogens.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Control of seed-borne pathogens on legumes by microbial and other alternative seed treatments

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Induction of systemic resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) via seed bacterization with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Cited by 60 publications

References 23 publications

Protective action of salicylic acid against bean yellow mosaic virus infection in Vicia faba leaves

Protective action of salicylic acid against bean yellow mosaic virus infection in Vicia faba leaves

Getting the ecology into interactions between plants and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens

Control of seed-borne pathogens on legumes by microbial and other alternative seed treatments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About