1997
DOI: 10.1093/jee/90.2.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Systemic Resistance in Cucumber Against Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
81
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also strengthened by the observed higher tolerance index of P. fluorescens treatments. However, such tendency shown by T. harzianum up to a limited extent showed conformity with the observations of Leyval et al (2002), Malcova´et al (2003 and Zhender et al (1997) elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is also strengthened by the observed higher tolerance index of P. fluorescens treatments. However, such tendency shown by T. harzianum up to a limited extent showed conformity with the observations of Leyval et al (2002), Malcova´et al (2003 and Zhender et al (1997) elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Root colonization of cucumber by four different PGPR reduced the level of cucurbitacin, which acts as a feeding stimulant to cucumber beetles (Zehnder et al 1997). Similar effects on insects that can transmit viruses, might reduce virus diseases through induced resistance against the insect vector rather than against the virus itself.…”
Section: Plant-mediated Disease Suppression By Rhizobacteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…tomato pathogenicity (20), including the sources of genetic resistance to the pathogen (6,18,33,34,39,50; V. F. Lawson and W. L. Summers, abstr., HortScience 17:503) and the genes which confer resistance to the disease (30, 41), this knowledge has not yet translated into an efficient strategy to control this minor, but occasionally devastating, foliar disease. Disease control is still based on traditional chemical and physical methods (3), and despite some significant successes, achieved mainly by the induction of systemic resistance in plants (1,27,45,52) and the displacement of a pathogen by nonvirulent strains of the same pathogen or by ecologically similar antagonistic strains (28,43,44,48,49), biological control of foliar bacterial pathogens is still largely at the experimental stage.The aim of this study was to measure the fluctuations in the populations of the two bacterial species, belonging to different genera, on the foliage and in the rhizospheres of tomato plants inoculated with one or both species. The effect of the relative sizes of the bacterial populations on the development of bacterial leaf speck disease in tomato plants and on plant growth was monitored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%