2018
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inductive and Deductive: Ambiguous Labels in Qualitative Content Analysis

Abstract: The propounded dualism in Content Analysis as quantitative and qualitative approaches is widely supported and justified in nursing literature. Nevertheless, another sort of dualism is proposed for Qualitative Content Analysis, suggesting the adoption of "inductive" and/or "deductive" approaches in the process of qualitative data analysis. These approaches have been referred and labelled as "inductive" or "conventional"; and "deductive" or "directed" content analysis in the literature. Authors argue that these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interview transcripts were analyzed using a deductive dominant thematic analysis, 17,18 allowing for categorization of data based on general themes derived from the interview guides, as well as identification of emergent themes; this approach ensured that we reached saturation in data collection. Our approach also allowed for comparison of themes across interviews and enabled us to characterize the ways PCPs facilitated their transition to delivering care through telemedicine as we present in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interview transcripts were analyzed using a deductive dominant thematic analysis, 17,18 allowing for categorization of data based on general themes derived from the interview guides, as well as identification of emergent themes; this approach ensured that we reached saturation in data collection. Our approach also allowed for comparison of themes across interviews and enabled us to characterize the ways PCPs facilitated their transition to delivering care through telemedicine as we present in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To systematically sort, synthesize, and summarize the free text responses into training topic categories, two researchers (ME & SS) conducted an inductive-dominant content analysis ( 22 ), with a third reviewer who resolved discrepancies (CBW). There were no a priori categories, and categories emerged from the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional content analysis is usually used when an existing theory on a phenomenon is limited (Graneheim et al, 2017;Hsieh & Shannon, 2005). An inductive reasoning (bottom-up) approach is used to enable a researcher to use participants' views to build broader themes and to generate a theory that interconnects with the themes (Armat et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%