2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inductive cold crucible melting of actinide-bearing murataite-based ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the powellite phase materials exhibit stability to 1000 years at anticipated doses (2×10 10 -2×10 11 Gy) based on current commercial HLW glasses [1]. The structural change was observed on in situ electron irradiated CaMoO 4 and BaMoO 4 after 10 13 Gy which suggests both powellite materials have similar radiation stability upon β-particles and -emissions. It is noted that actual self-irradiation during waste form storage would come from β-particles fluxes which are orders of magnitude lower than that used in TEM irradiation experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the powellite phase materials exhibit stability to 1000 years at anticipated doses (2×10 10 -2×10 11 Gy) based on current commercial HLW glasses [1]. The structural change was observed on in situ electron irradiated CaMoO 4 and BaMoO 4 after 10 13 Gy which suggests both powellite materials have similar radiation stability upon β-particles and -emissions. It is noted that actual self-irradiation during waste form storage would come from β-particles fluxes which are orders of magnitude lower than that used in TEM irradiation experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, recent work has shown that they can also be produced from a melt process analogous to GCM processing. For example, demonstrations have been completed using the Cold Crucible Induction Melter (CCIM) technology to produce several crystalline ceramic waste forms, including murataite-rich ceramics, [13,14] zirconolite/pyrochlore ceramics, [15] Synroc-C (zirconolite, hollandite, perovskite), [16,17] aluminotitanate ceramics, and zirconia [18]. This production route is advantageous since melters are already in use for commercial and defense high level waste (HLW) vitrification in several countries, and melter technology greatly reduces the potential for airborne contamination as compared to processes involving extensive powder handling operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have published throughputs of their CCIM on a mass per time per area basis, for example [18,[30][31][32]. Stefanovsky, et al, give a process throughput rate of 890 kg/m 2 /hr [processed 2.7 kg in 20 min (8.1 kg/hr) in a 108 mm ID CCIM = 884.2 kg/m 2 /hr] [32].…”
Section: Throughput To Be Competitive With Hip Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 While these materials are typically densified via hot isostatic pressing, recent work has shown that they can also be produced from a melt. For example, demonstrations have been completed using the Cold Crucible Induction Melter (CCIM) technology to produce several crystalline ceramic waste forms, including murataite-rich ceramics, 7 zirconolite/pyrochlore ceramics, 8 Synroc-C (zirconolite, hollandite, perovskite), 9 aluminotitanate ceramics, and zirconia. 10 This production route is advantageous since melters are already in use for defense high level waste (HLW) vitrification in several countries, and melter technology greatly reduces the potential for airborne contamination as compared to powder handling operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%