1999
DOI: 10.1109/4235.771167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality reconsidered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some systems, on the other hand, seem to allow analysis as if agents were rational [11], even though this may not be the case. Such systems are of particular interest, since they allow the use of traditional, tractable techniques for behavioral analysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some systems, on the other hand, seem to allow analysis as if agents were rational [11], even though this may not be the case. Such systems are of particular interest, since they allow the use of traditional, tractable techniques for behavioral analysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations show that, as in the original model, the attendance at the bar fluctuates around the threshold level, and does not seem to settle down into any regular pattern. Another work where the agents' strategies are allowed to co-evolve is that of Fogel et al (1999). In the model they conomics Discussion Paper propose, the agents are endowed with 10 predictors that take the form of autoregressive models with the number of lag terms and the relative coefficients being the variables that evolve over time using evolutionary programming.…”
Section: Learning In the El Farol Bar Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly put, there are two kinds of learning mechanism being studied in the literature. The first one is best-response learning (Arthur, 1994;Edmonds, 1999;Fogel et al, 1999;Challet et al, 2004;Atilgan, Atilgan and Demirel, 2008) and the second one is reinforcement learning (Bell and Sethares, 1999;Franke, 2003;Zambrano, 2004;Whitehead, 2008). 1 The typical results are as follows.…”
Section: El Farol Bar Problem: From Efficiency To Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These situations can be modeled as coordination games; in which agents are expected to select the majority strategiy 13,14 . However, traditional game theory, does not consider how agents know which equilibrium should be realized if a coordination game has multiple and equally plausible Pareto-ranked equilibria 15,16 . This limitation is all the more surprising in games with common goal because one expects that players will coordinate to the Paretodominant equilibrium 17 .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%