Industrial Companies in Innovation Ecosystems

Noll, Frederik; Lüke, Wiebke; Wappler, Mona; Oles, Markus

doi:10.1109/ice.2018.8436300

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, "[o]ne major challenge for the digital transformation of our society is the question of data sovereignty. By their very nature, unprotected data can be multiplied with very low costs and without a loss of quality" (Noll et al, 2018). Moreover, the significance of data is context-dependent: "the main criticality of data sovereignty: the definition and characterization of the area of pertinence [geographical location where data is meaningful for the application goals] is extremely mutable, and dependent on the application, and may not coincide among the one for the clouds and the one for the IoT [Internet of Things]" (Esposito et al, 2019: 4525).…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data sovereignty: A review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New data-driven technologies yield benefits and potentials, but also confront different agents and stakeholders with challenges in retaining control over their data. Our goal in this study is to arrive at a clear picture of what is meant by data sovereignty in such problem settings. To this end, we review 341 publications and analyze the frequency of different notions such as data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and cyber sovereignty. We go on to map agents they concern, in which context they appear, and which values they allude to. While our sample reveals a considerable degree of divergence and an occasional lack of clarity about intended meanings of data sovereignty, we propose a conceptual grid to systematize different dimensions and connotations. Each of them relates in some way to meaningful control, ownership, and other claims to data articulated by a variety of agents ranging from individuals to countries. Data sovereignty alludes to a nuanced mixture of normative concepts such as inclusive deliberation and recognition of the fundamental rights of data subjects.

show abstract

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%