2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial gamma computed tomography using high aspect ratio scintillator detectors (A Geant4 simulation)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These diameters were selected depending on the size of the standard 1-inch and 2-inch photomultipliers (PMTs). The other reason for choosing a 5 cm diameter and 50 cm length detector was to compare the results with the output of the NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with the same size as previously simulated [22]. Although, the longer the detector, the bigger objects can be scanned.…”
Section: Rod Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These diameters were selected depending on the size of the standard 1-inch and 2-inch photomultipliers (PMTs). The other reason for choosing a 5 cm diameter and 50 cm length detector was to compare the results with the output of the NaI (Tl) scintillation detector with the same size as previously simulated [22]. Although, the longer the detector, the bigger objects can be scanned.…”
Section: Rod Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the output signals of the PMTs, S 1 , and S 2 , could be obtained using eqs. (2.1) and (2.2) as follows [22]:…”
Section: Rod Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The components of computed tomography systems are very expensive; therefore, to assess the possibility of solving computed tomography design problems for specific test objects, it is effective to use computational experiments [13][14][15][16]. The simplest scanning scheme in computed tomography is the geometry of a narrow parallel beam [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the contribution of a pixel to the weight matrix varies with projection [30]. Classical analytical approaches to weight matrix generation include a line length and a strip-area model [33][34][35]. In the line length model, the weight matrix is the beam intersection length in the pixel and in the strip area model, it is the intersection area divided by the beam width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%