This work presented two fuzzy logic (FL) schemes for speed-controlled brushless DC motors. The first controller is a Type 1 FL controller (T1FLC), whereas the second controller is an interval Type 2 FL controller (IT2FLC). The two proposed controllers were compared in terms of system dynamics and performance. For a fair comparison, the same type and number of membership functions were used for both controllers. The effectiveness of the structures of the two FL controllers was verified through simulation in MATLAB/SIMULINK environment. Simulation result showed that IT2FLC exhibited better performance than T1FLC.
INTRODUCTIONBrushless DC (BLDC) motors can be used in several fields and applications, such as industrial automated electric vehicles and aerospace computers. BLDC motors exhibit several advantages over brushed DC motors. They are characterised by low maintenance due to commutator disposal, long operating life due to lack of friction and electrical losses and high power density [1,2]. The BLDC motors have no brushes, which prolongs the life time of motor and avoids their maintenance. Additionally, these motors are characterized by high electromagnetic torque-to-weight ratio, which make them suitable for most application [2,3]. Compared with brushed DC motors and induction machines, BLDC motors have lower inertia that enables faster dynamic response to reference commands. In addition, they are more efficient due to the permanent magnets that can perform with virtually zero rotor losses [3][4][5].BLDC motors have a complex and nonlinear model. To overcome the control problem, a nonlinear fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is used to control the speed of a BLDC motor. This intelligent controller has a simple structure and is relatively easy to implement due to its modest fuzzy rule in the rule base [6,7]. Recently, the intelligent control of BLDC motors has elicited the attention of many researchers. A review of the most relevant studies is presented in this paper. R. Arulmozhiyal and R. Kandiban compared a conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller and a fuzzy PID controller in terms of the speed control of BLDC motors. The results were obtained using MATLAB/SIMULINK and then experimentally verified.The simulated and practical results showed that the fuzzy PID.Controller outperformed the conventional PID controller [8]. E. Blessy and M. Murugan analysed a BLDC motor model and designed an FLC to improve the dynamic performance of speed control. They compared the fuzzy logic (FL), proportional, proportional-integral and PID controllers to evaluate the impact of each controller on speed dynamic performance [9].