1999
DOI: 10.2307/2991816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Location and Protection: The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Nontariff Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A large literature suggests that social cleavages are likely to have very different effects when the groups they define are concentrated than when they are dispersed (e.g., Bush and Reinhardt 1999;Mozaffar, Scarritt, and Galaich 2003;Rogowski, Kayser, and Kotin 1999;Toft 2003). To the extent that variation across countries in the spatial distribution of groups affects the impact of ethnic diversity on policy formation and growth, this aspect of the causal process will be left out of the analysis.…”
Section: General Problems With Measuring Ethnic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large literature suggests that social cleavages are likely to have very different effects when the groups they define are concentrated than when they are dispersed (e.g., Bush and Reinhardt 1999;Mozaffar, Scarritt, and Galaich 2003;Rogowski, Kayser, and Kotin 1999;Toft 2003). To the extent that variation across countries in the spatial distribution of groups affects the impact of ethnic diversity on policy formation and growth, this aspect of the causal process will be left out of the analysis.…”
Section: General Problems With Measuring Ethnic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for example, Hansen (1990) and Busch and Reinhardt (1999). Grossman and Helpman (2005) and Willmann (2005) show in a small-country trade model how asymmetries in the distribution of industries across constituencies may lead to a protectionist bias in national legislators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a method should avert potential heteroskedasticity to bias our results. Heteroskedastic models like this one have been frequently used to explore heterogenous behaviors (Alvarez and Brehm, 1997, 1998Busch and Reinhardt, 1999;Gabel, 1998;Lee, 2002;Krutz, 2005). So far, heteroskedastic probit and heteroskedastic ordered probit models are the most used tools in investigating discrete heterogenous choices.…”
Section: Extensions To the Baseline Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%