2018
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Meat Production

Abstract: This review surveys the past 30 years of the anthropology of corporate animal agribusiness, analyzing how various themes embedded in the words of the article's title—industrial, meat, and production—have been taken up by ethnographers of confinement farms and mechanized slaughterhouses. In so doing, it describes how the literature finds the animal life-and-death cycle underlying modern meat to be a hybrid and uneven mixture of industrialisms both old and emerging, at once violent and caring, far-reaching yet i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this essay expands human–animal entanglement literature and its focus on multispecies relations of care, affect or exploitation (Blanchette, 2018; Govindrajan, 2015; Kirksey et al., 2018). Instead, I place nonhuman bodies as political actors in contemporary settler/colonial processes in the borderlands in the climate change era, by exploring these dynamics in the context of Palestine/Israel.…”
Section: Human–nonhuman Entanglements In Contemporary Colonial Contextsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Hence, this essay expands human–animal entanglement literature and its focus on multispecies relations of care, affect or exploitation (Blanchette, 2018; Govindrajan, 2015; Kirksey et al., 2018). Instead, I place nonhuman bodies as political actors in contemporary settler/colonial processes in the borderlands in the climate change era, by exploring these dynamics in the context of Palestine/Israel.…”
Section: Human–nonhuman Entanglements In Contemporary Colonial Contextsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Instead, the work of raising the BSF reveals a space of dependent cohabitation where new practices of contact and human care and attention prove critical for insect survival. A similar tension between care and control occurs in animal husbandry, where attention to specificities, unpredictability, and embodied practice constitute the human efforts necessary for achieving industrial standardization (Pandian 2008;Singleton 2010;Blanchette 2018). In the BSF project, success in rendering biophysical nature into a reliable infrastructure-mechanized, reliable, and invisible-depends on an intimate relationship between humans and insects.…”
Section: Producing Circularity Through Laboratory Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prompted by fear of disease and environmental contamination, enclosures circumscribe and control multispecies entanglements that prevent forms of care and identification between humans and insects (Law and Mol 2008;Nading 2014;Blanchette 2015;Kirksey 2015). For example, the control of mosquito populations by public health authorities has been characterized as a form of human labor intended to enact interspecies separation and to disentangle relations of cohabitation (Kelly and Lezaun 2014).…”
Section: Enclosures Of Insect Rearing and Urban Livingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a rather pointed riposte to how Euro‐American thought has hoarded awareness of death for humans so as to limit accountability to other species. This attitude becomes apparent in everyday indifference to practices like industrial animal slaughter (Blanchette 2018) and forms part of a long history stemming from both Aristotelean philosophy and Christian theology of treating nonhuman animals as “outside the terms of moral reference” (Thomas 1983, 148). For twentieth‐century philosophers like Martin Heidegger, humans could thus still be the only animals who “experience death as death” (quoted in Weil 2012, 101), while poets such as Rainer Maria Rilke (2000, 47) could describe animals as being “free from death.” In this tradition animals are said to never respond to their mortality, only to react to it (Derrida 2008).…”
Section: Mourning Grief and The Politics Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%