2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial policy and asset prices: Evidence from the Made in China 2025 policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prerequisite for the establishment of policy evaluation is that the development status of cities before the pilot policy is introduced is similar. Referring to Liu et al (2022) 29 , we adopt a parallel trend test to verify the effectiveness of Made in China 2025 pilot policy. Figure 2 shows the result of parallel trend test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prerequisite for the establishment of policy evaluation is that the development status of cities before the pilot policy is introduced is similar. Referring to Liu et al (2022) 29 , we adopt a parallel trend test to verify the effectiveness of Made in China 2025 pilot policy. Figure 2 shows the result of parallel trend test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the industrial policy of Made in China 2025 was proposed, scholars have predominantly focused on exploring its economic effects on technological innovation 27 , digital transformation 28 , and total factor productivity (TFP) 29 , while the potential environmental effects have been neglected. Chen et al (2024) 30 found that Made in China 2025 promotes firm innovation through tax incentives, public subsidies, convenient financing, academic collaboration and talent incentives.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%