Industrial Regional Space in the “Core–Periphery” System in Russia

Abstract

Abstract—the center-periphery model is used to explain modern geographical processes and phenomena, but nobody systematically studies the position of Russian regions in the system of center-peripheral relations. The current study is aimed at eliminating this gap. The purpose of research is to test the methodology for identifying central and peripheral regions in the Russian industrial space and the main features of the industrial development of different types of regions. Statistical and mathematical-statistical research methods based on Rosstat data in 2005–2020. The sample included 83 subjects of the Federation (with the exception of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol), for which there are comparable data series. All regions are assigned to one of the types: core, sub-center, sub-periphery, periphery. The nuclear regions include highly industrial regions with a high base and competitive industries. The group of sub-center regions includes medium-sized industrial regions with high dynamics. The sub-periphery concentrated 40% of the Russian regions. Regions of this group were further divided into subtypes according to the dynamics of industrial development and specialization. The periphery was divided into 2 subtypes: 1) depressed regions with a high base shrinking in the post-soviet period; 2) underdeveloped regions with a low base. It is noted that shifts in the center-periphery system are inertial. Over the past 15 years, the concentration of industrial production in cores and sub-centers has increased, but the investment dynamics is higher in sub-centers. The role of old-industrial sub-peripheral regions is most strongly reduced. The role of the underdeveloped periphery in industrial employment of the population is increasing. The findings can be used to further adjust the regional industrial policy and develop a strategy for the spatial development of Russia.