2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0954-349x(02)00052-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial structure and aggregate growth

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
184
0
22

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
15
184
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The above is in line with existing evidence that economic integration within the EU has led to changing patterns of production and specialization among EU countries and regions (AMITI, 1998) and that these changes have affected the economic performance of countries and regions and the level of cohesion (KRUGMAN, 1991;PENEDER, 2003).…”
Section: Theory and Evidencesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The above is in line with existing evidence that economic integration within the EU has led to changing patterns of production and specialization among EU countries and regions (AMITI, 1998) and that these changes have affected the economic performance of countries and regions and the level of cohesion (KRUGMAN, 1991;PENEDER, 2003).…”
Section: Theory and Evidencesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several empirical studies, in addition, indicate that the specialization profile matters for macroeconomic performance, and that countries that are able to shift their industrial structure towards areas characterized by higher technological opportunities experience a more dynamic aggregate performance in the long run [110,111,112,113,114,115,116].…”
Section: The Co-evolution Of National and Sectoral Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the industrial structure explained very little of the cross-sectional differences in the country return volatilities. Peneder [17] applied dynamic panel estimations based on data of 28 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, and the results confirmed that the industrial structure had been a significant determinant of macroeconomic development and growth in the 1990s. Zhang, Deng [18] made use of environmental influence modulus of industrial departments (EIMID) and quantitatively evaluated the entire eco-environmental impact of the industrial structure change in Chongqing from 1997 to 2008 by integrated eco-environmental influence modulus of industrial structure (IEIMIS).…”
Section: Research On Lce and Industrial Structure Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This method is appropriate because the grey system models are suitable for incomplete information and increase the certainty. Li [17] and Dang et al [20] also used the same models, and their results showed that the models are suitable to optimize industrial structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%