Industrialisation after a Deep Economic Crisis: Indonesia

Aswicahyono, Haryo; Hill, Hal; Narjoko, Dionisius

doi:10.1080/00220380903318087

Cited by 39 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From 2000 to 2005, average growth was just at 4.5%, considerably lower than the pre-crisis average of 7.3% from 1990 to 1996. Performance varied across sectors, but the slowdown was even more pronounced in manufacturing, where output since 2000 had been growing at little more than half the pre-crisis rate (Aswicahyono et al 2010). Indonesia was hit relatively harder that other Asian economies for a number of reasons.…”

Section: Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Indonesian economy had more or less stagnated since its independence in 1945. Until the mid1960s, the process of modern industrialization had barely commenced in Indonesia (Aswicahyono et al 2010, Rock 2003. By 1965, the economy was described to be in shambles.…”

Section: B Trade Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indonesia also underwent a period of rapid structural change, as exports diversified from simple consumer goods and basic resource processing to a wider range of manufactures with increasing technological sophistication (Aswicahyono et al 2010). The country soon emerged as a significant industrial exporter.…”

Section: Mid-1980s To 1996: Rationalization and Export Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indonesia was among the worst hit in the region. It experienced a large scale capital flight in the second half of 1997, rapid depreciation and financial distress (Aswicahyono et al 2010). There was a loss of macroeconomic control, as the rupiah depreciated from Rp2,500 per US dollar to Rp17,500 at its worst point, and inflation was running at over 100.0% on an annualized basis.…”

Section: Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective

Tijaja

Faisal²

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The gains of a country from participating in global value chains (GVCs) will depend on the productive activities taking place in its jurisdiction and their linkages to the domestic economy. Lead firms' decision on where to locate and how to coordinate production activities is influenced, among others, by industrial policies. On the one side, policy space provides governments with some leverage in guiding economic activities and influencing development outcomes. On the other hand, policy risks have the potential to adversely affect the outcomes. This study focuses on industrial policies in Indonesia, using the mineral sector as a mini case study. The case study assesses the Indonesian Government's recent effort to boost domestic value addition in the sector. This paper argues that the effectiveness of government policies in maximizing the gains from GVC participation depends not only on policy design, but also on policy consistency and coherence, effective implementation, and coordination. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not in any way be attributed to the institutions with which they are associated. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANKADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use.By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term "country" in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Note: In this publication, "$" refers to US dollars.The ADB Economics Working Paper Series is a forum for stimulating discussion and eliciting feedback on ongoing and recently completed research and policy studies undertaken by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) staff, consultants, or resource persons. The series deals with key economic and development problems, particularly those facing the Asia and Pacific region; as well as conceptual, analytical, or methodological issues relating to project/program economic analysis, and statistical data and measurement. The series aims to enhance the knowledge on Asia's development and policy challenges; strengthen analytical rigor and quality of ADB's country partnership strategies, and its subregional and country operations; and improve the quality and availability of statistical data and development indicators for monitoring development effectiveness.

show abstract

Section: Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: B Trade Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mid-1980s To 1996: Rationalization and Export Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective

Tijaja

Faisal²

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since in the middle of 1960s, Indonesia has adopted an industrialization policy and positioned the manufacturing industry as being the most important sector for the Indonesian economics (Aswicahyono et al, 2010). However, the high concentration of manufacturing firms in Java Island characterized Java Island as a dominant province, and they remain a concern with regard to economic disparity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends and Determinants of the Geographical Distribution of Economic Activities: Evidence From Indonesian Manufacturing

Khoirunurrofik¹

2017

JIAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyzes the trends and determinant factors of vis-à-vis spatial distribution in Indonesian manufacturing during the period of 1990-2010. There is a long-term increasing trend of regional specialization driven by core regions in Java Island and by affluent regions outside of Java Island. Among resource-based and labor-intensive industries, there is a smooth declining trend of geographical concentration. An increasing trend in regional specialization and geographical concentration during the economic crisis is identified turns into a decreasing trend at the onset of setting up a decentralization policy and then pushed upward again. Finally, by applying spatially weighted Ellison-Glaeser (EG) Index, it is found that labor skills, export activities, and wage rates strongly determine the degree of agglomeration among Indonesian manufacturing industries.

show abstract

National Development Planning, Industrial Policy, and Sustainable Growth Challenges in Indonesia and Malaysia: A Comparative Historical Analysis

Yağcı¹,

Ardiani²

2017

Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrialisation after a Deep Economic Crisis: Indonesia

Cited by 39 publications

References 20 publications

Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective

Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective

Trends and Determinants of the Geographical Distribution of Economic Activities: Evidence From Indonesian Manufacturing

National Development Planning, Industrial Policy, and Sustainable Growth Challenges in Indonesia and Malaysia: A Comparative Historical Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About