2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
68
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
21
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a 1% increase in trade openness causes a 0.316% increase in CO 2 emissions in the short run. This is similar to the findings in Shahbaz et al [44] for the case of Bangladesh. The error-correction term reveals the CO 2 adjustment rate back to its long-run equilibrium level after a shock.…”
Section: Ardl Cointegration Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, a 1% increase in trade openness causes a 0.316% increase in CO 2 emissions in the short run. This is similar to the findings in Shahbaz et al [44] for the case of Bangladesh. The error-correction term reveals the CO 2 adjustment rate back to its long-run equilibrium level after a shock.…”
Section: Ardl Cointegration Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The long-term national policies to increase trade volume enhance environmental quality in Malaysia. However, in comparison to past literature, our results contradict with Shahbaz et al ( , 2014a who noted that trade openness increases CO 2 emissions for Malaysia, Bangladesh and Tunisia but consistent with in case of Pakistan. The positive and statistically significant relationship found between comparative advantage effect and CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Ectcontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…We solve this problem by applying the ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration in the presence of structural breaks following Shahbaz et al (2013Shahbaz et al ( , 2014. Table-5 shows the empirical results of this bounds testing method and evidence reveals that the calculated F-statistic exceeds the upper critical bound at 1%, 5% and 10% levels of significance, respectively.…”
Section: Results Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%