2019
DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2019.1697598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry 4.0 and the future of quality work in the global digital economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimistic view of the 4IR sees endless possibilities and opportunities for new industries, jobs, occupations and entrepreneurial opportunities, as well as improvement in living standards (World Economic Forum, 2016). However, there is another view that recognises that new technologies may undermine labour standards, create short-term and insecure jobs, increase inequalities, erode business and tax regulations and concentrate power within global tech multinationals (De Ruyter et al, 2019; Stanford, 2017; Rainnie and Dean, 2020). There is a certain degree of hyperbole around Schwab’s predictions, his assumptions about the inevitability of the process and there is also an absence of critical analysis of the impact of the changes in terms of its distributional consequences and its impact by gender, age and minority groups (Howcroft and Rubery, 2019; Rainnie and Dean, 2020).…”
Section: Technology and The Fourth Industrial Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimistic view of the 4IR sees endless possibilities and opportunities for new industries, jobs, occupations and entrepreneurial opportunities, as well as improvement in living standards (World Economic Forum, 2016). However, there is another view that recognises that new technologies may undermine labour standards, create short-term and insecure jobs, increase inequalities, erode business and tax regulations and concentrate power within global tech multinationals (De Ruyter et al, 2019; Stanford, 2017; Rainnie and Dean, 2020). There is a certain degree of hyperbole around Schwab’s predictions, his assumptions about the inevitability of the process and there is also an absence of critical analysis of the impact of the changes in terms of its distributional consequences and its impact by gender, age and minority groups (Howcroft and Rubery, 2019; Rainnie and Dean, 2020).…”
Section: Technology and The Fourth Industrial Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i4.0 has not gone unquestioned (Rainnie and Dean, 2020). Pfeiffer (2017a) has warned that the technologically deterministic view of i4.0 and its technological marvels threaten a ‘digital despotism’ that will make human workers subservient to integrated digital production systems that monopolise decision-making.…”
Section: And Then Came Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier work (Rainnie and Dean, 2020), I looked critically at the emerging i4.0 debate and how it related (or didn’t) to the literature on the future of work, with a particular focus on Australia. In this article, I return to 94.0, but look at the supposed role of three-dimensional (3D) printing in the new world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It draws on recent work from the Centre for Future Work examining the prospects for Australian manufacturing renewal in a post-COVID-19 economy. It integrates complementary analysis developed by Rainnie (2021) and Rainnie and Dean (2019, 2021), critically evaluating the Fourth Industrial Revolution (i4.0) and its implications for the Australian economy (in general, and for manufacturing in particular). The aim of the article is to contribute to, and further develop, the debate about the future of government intervention in manufacturing and industry policy in Australia, in hopes of developing a more cohesive framework for active industry policy responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%